Study | Selection (***) | Comparability (*) | Exposure/outcome (*) | Method of assessment | Quality Assessment | Quality Assessment score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charles et al. [9] | *** | Â | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Waite et al. [26] | * | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Satisfactory | 3 |
Li et al. [27] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Egbe et al. [28] | *** | Â | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Emlet et al. [29] | *** | * | Â | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Akena et al. [30] | * | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Satisfactory | 3 |
Letshwenyo-Maruatona et al. [31] | * | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Satisfactory | 3 |
Chan et al. [32] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Wu et al. [33] | *** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Very Good | 5 |
Rael and Hampanda [34] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Zhang et al. [35] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Peltzer and Ramlagan [36] | *** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Very Good | 5 |
Zhang et al. [37] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Srithanaviboonchai et al. [38] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Li et al. [39] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Stangl et al. [40] | *** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Very Good | 5 |
Stevelink et al. [41] | *** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Very Good | 5 |
Zhang et al. [42] | *** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Very Good | 5 |
Rivera et al. [43] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Sayles et al. [15] | * | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Satisfactory | 3 |
Li et al. [44] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Genberg et al. [45] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Earnshaw et al. [46] | *** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Very Good | 5 |
Burke et al. [47] | *** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Very Good | 5 |
Turan et al. [48] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Mao et al. [49] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Zhang et al. [50] | * | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Satisfactory | 3 |
Rintamaki et al. [51] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Liu et al. [52] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Wolitski et al. [53] | ** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Good | 4 |
Levi-Minzi and Surratt [54] | *** | * | * | Newcastle-Ottawa scale adapted for cross-sectional studies | Very Good | 5 |