Skip to main content

Table 2 Post-hoc analysis for the significant results

From: Reaching out to stakeholders: The use of knowledge terminology on the websites of Australian public hospitals

Variables Tested

Chi-Square, df

p-value

More than Expected

Fewer than Expected

Size vs MentionedK

26.67, 1

 < .001*

Large, Yes

Large, No

Small, Yes

Size vs MentionedKC

23.86, 1

 < .001*

Large, Yes

Small, Yes

Size vs MentionedKR

18.29, 1

 < .001*

Large, Yes

Small, Yes

Size vs MentionedKS

15.61, 1

 < .001*

Large, Yes

Small, Yes

Size vs MentionedKM

8.51, 1

.004*

Large, Yes

N/A

Size vs MentionedTotal

24.51, 1

 < .001*

Large, Yes

Small, Yes

State vs MentionedK

24.87, 7

 < .001*

Vic, Yes

WA, Yes

State vs MentionedKC

16.07, 7

.02**

Vic, Yes

N/A

State vs MentionedTotal

19.88, 7

.006*

Vic, Yes

N/A

Dom vs MentionedK

59.33, 3

 < .001*

3rd, Yes

2nd, Yes

2nd, No

Dom vs MentionedKC

35.09, 3

 < .001*

3rd, Yes

2nd, Yes

N/A

Dom vs MentionedKR

22.60, 3

 < .001*

3rd, Yes

2nd, Yes

N/A

Dom vs MentionedKS

44.03, 3

 < .001*

2nd, Yes

2nd, No

Dom vs MentionedKM

17.17

.001*

2nd, Yes

N/A

Dom vs MentionedTotal

49.45, 3

 < .001*

3rd, Yes

2nd, Yes

Yes, No

P or O vs MentionedK

89.76, 2

 < .001*

O, No

P, Yes

O, Yes

P, No

P or O vs MentionedKC

48.98, 2

 < .001*

P, Yes

P, No

P or O vs MentionedKR

25.97, 2

 < .001*

P, Yes

N/A

P or O vs MentionedKS

44.50, 2

 < .001*

P, Yes

P, No

P or O vs MentionedKM

13.17, 2

.001*

P, Yes

N/A

P or O vs MentionedTotal

68.42, 2

 < .001*

O, No

P, Yes

P, No

  1. A p-value with an * indicates significance at the 0.01 level while ** indicates significance at the 0.05 level