Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive results for the formal review of the manual (n = 11; missing = 1)

From: An instrument for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation: development, evaluation, and inter-rater reliability

Criterion

M

Range

M

M

M

How do you judge …

IM/GP

O/S

N/P

… the structure of the manual

1.8

1–3

1.8

2.3

1.3

… the extent of the manual

2.6

1–5

1.8

3.8

2.3

… the layout of the manual

2.3

1–4

1.8

2.3

3.0

… the clarity of the quality domains and their test items

2.1

1–3

1.8

2.3

2.3

… the understandability of the manuals‘introduction

2.1

1–4

1.8

2.5

3.0

… the understandability of the test items

3.2

2–5

2.5

4.0

2.3

… the manual in total

2.4

1–3

2.3

2.5

2.4

  1. six-point rating scale (1 = very good; 6 = insufficient). M Mean, IM/GP Internal medicine/general practitioner, O/S Orthopaedic/surgery, N/P Neurology/psychiatry
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us