Table 2 Fixed-effect regression model for the percentage change in number of FTE nurses
Scheduled training programs | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For all employees | For new employees | |||||||||
Coef. | SE | 95% CI | Coef. | SE | 95% CI | |||||
Planning training programs for all employees lagged | 2.1 | 1.4 | −0.7 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | −0.8 | 1.8 | ||
Number of FTE nurses lagged | −23.9 | 1.6 | −27.0 | −20.8 | * | −23.9 | 1.6 | − 27.0 | −20.8 | * |
Number of FTE nurses lagged squared | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | * | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | * |
Number of clients per FTE nurses lagged | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | * | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | * |
Year dummy (reference 2012) | ||||||||||
in 2013 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 3.5 | * | 2.9 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 3.6 | * |
in 2014 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 6.9 | * | 6.1 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 7.0 | * |
Intercept | 96.5 | 5.9 | 84.9 | 108.0 | * | 97.5 | 5.9 | 85.9 | 109.1 | * |