Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of child, mother, and household characteristics between the intervention and comparison samples at baseline, 2005 DHS weighted data

From: The effect of performance-based financing on illness, care-seeking and treatment among children: an impact evaluation in Rwanda

 

Total

Intervention

Comparison

Difference

 

(N = 2619)

%

(N = 1631)

%

(N = 988)

%

Perc.Pta

p-valueb

Child

        

 Age <12 months

590

22.5

376

23.0

214

21.6

1.40

0.406

 Sex: Boy

1333

50.9

843

51.7

489

49.5

2.20

0.289

 Birth order: 1st birth

439

16.7

275

16.9

164

16.5

0.40

0.846

 Birth order: ≥ 5th

988

37.7

632

38.7

356

36.0

2.70

0.335

 Slept under bednet

277

10.8

179

11.2

97

10.1

1.10

0.621

 Health facility birth

586

22.4

348

21.4

238

24.1

−2.70

0.409

Mother

        

 Age <20 years

497

19.0

336

20.6

161

16.3

4.30

0.064

 Age ≥35 years

386

14.7

239

14.6

147

14.9

−0.30

0.886

 Primary school grad.

445

17.0

275

16.8

170

17.2

−0.40

0.881

 Married

1310

88.2

1429

87.6

881

89.1

−1.50

0.380

 Previous child death

1126

43.0

714

43.8

412

41.7

2.10

0.495

Household

        

 Wealth status

        

 Poorest

498

19.0

318

19.5

180

18.2

1.30

0.619

 Poorer

534

20.4

296

18.1

238

24.1

−6.00

0.050

 Middle

548

20.9

367

22.5

181

18.3

4.20

0.109

 Less poor

525

20.0

342

21.0

182

18.4

2.60

0.326

 Least poor

515

19.6

308

18.9

206

20.9

−2.00

0.608

 Health insurance

1283

49.0

771

47.3

512

51.8

−4.50

0.364

 Rural residence

2399

91.6

1523

93.4

876

88.6

4.80

0.254

 Improved toiletc

610

23.3

338

20.7

272

27.5

−6.80

0.077

 Clean water sourced

871

33.2

601

36.9

269

27.3

13.50

0.066

  1. aPercentage point difference between intervention and comparison groups
  2. bT-tests comparing proportions between intervention and comparison groups
  3. cIncludes flush toilets and improved latrines
  4. dIncludes tap water and water from improved wells