From: Household catastrophic health expenditure: evidence from Georgia and its policy implications
Variable | B | Wald | P Value | Odds Ratio | CI 95.0% for Odds Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | -0.67 | 14.6 | <0.001 | 0.17 | |
Chronic costs (1 if HH had recurrent cost due to chronic condition) | 1.49 | 109.4 | <0.001 | 4.41 | (3.34: 5.83) |
Hospitalization (1 if HH faced cost of hospitalization otherwise 0) | 3.30 | 85.4 | <0.001 | 27.13 | (13.47: 54.64) |
Poorest Quintile (Reference Group) | 72.8 | <0.001 | |||
2nd Quintile | -0.82 | 20.7 | <0.001 | 0.44 | (0.31: 0.63) |
3rd Quintile | -1.15 | 36.5 | <0.001 | 0.32 | (0.22: 0.46) |
4th Quintile | -1.34 | 45.1 | <0.001 | 0.26 | (0.18: 0.39) |
Richest Quintile | -1.30 | 41.3 | <0.001 | 0.27 | (0.18: 0.41) |
Capital city Tbilisi (Reference group) | 13.4 | 0.001 | |||
East Georgia | -0.53 | 9.9 | 0.002 | 0.59 | (0.42: 0.82) |
West Georgia | -0.61 | 12.1 | 0.001 | 0.55 | (0.39: 0.77) |
Log likelihood | 1,764.1 | ||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.085 | ||||
Hosmer-Lemeshow test | χ2(8) = 11.16 | ||||
P = 0.19 | |||||
Observations | 2,859 |