Peer Review reports
From: Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Jun 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stuart James Peacock |
9 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson |
20 Aug 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Shannon Sibbald |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Aug 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson |
22 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stuart James Peacock |
4 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Shannon Sibbald |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stuart James Peacock |
20 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson |
13 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angela Coulter |
24 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Shannon Sibbald |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
5 Mar 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Mar 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-43 |
You can find further information about peer review here.