Table 2 Factor analysis: rotated matrix of factor loadings (n = 666)
Item number | Item description | Factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
15 | Staff’s explanations concerning the screening process | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.63 | 0.14 |
27 | Information concerning the possibility of having additional exams | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.86 | -0.16 |
34 | Information concerning the follow-up in the screening program | -0.09 | -0.04 | 0.77 | 0.24 |
12 | Information concerning the advantages and disadvantages to participate in the PQDCS | 0.09 | -0.01 | 0.08 | 0.65 |
16 | Clarity of the PQDCS informed consent form | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 0.65 |
5 | Clarity of the information given in the PQDCS documents | -0.01 | 0.13 | -0.10 | 0.83 |
14 | Technician’s respectful attitude | 0.89 | -0.09 | -0.04 | 0.09 |
20 | Technician’s explanation | 0.77 | -0.01 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
26 | Technician’s professionalism | 0.94 | 0.03 | 0.04 | -0.09 |
32 | Technician’s technical competence | 0.83 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
10 | Cleanliness of the radiologic facilities | 0.17 | 0.54 | -0.02 | 0.21 |
23 | Privacy allowed by the installation | 0.11 | 0.76 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
29 | Comfort of the changing room | -0.09 | 0.87 | 0.05 | -0.05 |
4 | Comfort of the waiting room | -0.03 | 0.62 | 0.06 | 0.16 |
Proportion of the common variance | 74% | 15% | 6% | 5% | |
Eigenvalues | 30.0 | 6.0 | 2.7 | 2.0 | |