Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison among T2D patients who consulted a dietitian and those who did not across a number of selected variables*

From: Factors associated with consulting a dietitian for diabetes management: a cross-sectional study

 

Independent variables

Overall n=333+

Consulted a dietitian n = 127

Did not consult a dietitian n = 205

OR (95% CI)

Socio-demographic characteristics

Age (years)

60.18 ± 11.90

59.50 ± 11.91

60.63 ± 11.90

0.99(0.97-1.01)

Gender

Male

184(55.3)

65(35.3)

119(64.7)

1

Female

149(44.7)

62(41.9)

86(58.1)

1.32(0.85-2.06)

Marital status

Not married

95(28.5)

38(40.4)

56(59.6)

1

Married

238(71.5)

89(37.4)

149(62.6)

0.88(0.54-1.44)

Education

Illiterate

39(11.8)

12(30.8)

27(69.2)

1

Elementary School level

119(36.0)

40(33.9)

70(66.1)

1.15(0.53-2.52)

High School level

87(26.3)

33(37.9)

54(62.1)

1.38(0.61-3.08)

Diploma, graduate/postgraduate

86(26.0)

42(48.8)

44(51.2)

2.15(0.96-4.78)

Employment

Unemployed

221(66.4)

87(39.5)

133(60.5)

1

Employed

112(33.6)

40(35.7)

72(64.3)

0.85(0.53-1.36)

Crowding Index

≤2 persons/room

251(75.8)

101(40.4)

149(59.6)

1

>2persons/room

80(24.2)

24(30.0)

56(70.0)

0.63(0.37-1.09)

Place of birth

Village/Town

142 (42.6)

54(38.0)

88(62.0)

1

City

191(57.4)

73(38.4)

117(61.6)

1.02(0.65-1.59)

Presence of insurance for outpatient visits

No

187(56.3)

56(30.1)

130(69.9)

1

Yes

145(43.7)

71(49.0)

74(51.0)

2.23(1.42-3.50)

Disease Attributes

Self-assessment of current health status

Poor

66(19.8)

25(38.5)

40(61.5)

1

Fair

157(47.1)

63(40.1)

94(59.9)

1.07(0.59-1.94)

Good

110(33.0)

39(35.5)

71(64.5)

0.88(0.47-1.66)

Type of Clinic Attended

Public

179(53.8)

53(29.8)

125(70.2)

1

Private

154(46.2)

74(48.1)

80(51.9)

2.18(1.39-3.42)

Family history of diabetes

No

151(45.3)

51(33.8)

100(66.2)

1

Yes

182(54.7)

76(42.0)

105(58.0)

1.42(0.91-2.22)

Duration of T2D (years)

11.08 ± 8.65

12.60 ± 9.23

10.11 ± 8.17

1.03(1.01-1.06)

Complications of Diabetes

No

138(41.4)

46(33.3)

92(66.7)

1

Yes

195(58.6)

81(41.8)

113(58.2)

1.43(0.91-2.26)

Patients’ perceptions regarding T2D management

Importance of controlling blood glucose in managing T2D

No/maybe it helps

43(12.9)

12(27.9)

31(72.1)

1

It helps a lot

290(87.1)

115(39.8)

174(60.2)

1.71(0.84-3.46)

Importance of diet in controlling blood glucose levels

No/maybe it helps

54(16.2)

15(27.8)

39(72.2)

1

It helps a lot

279(83.8)

112(40.3)

166(59.7)

1.75(0.92-3.33)

Importance of exercise in controlling blood glucose levels

No/maybe it helps

23(6.9)

9(39.1)

14(60.9)

1

It helps a lot

310(93.1)

118(38.2)

191(61.8)

0.96(0.40-2.29)

A dietitian can assist in changing and regulating dietary habits

No

77(25.2)

25(32.9)

51(67.1)

1

Yes

229(74.8)

102(44.5)

127(55.5)

1.64(0.95-2.83)

Practice of lifestyle modifications

Currently following a special diet

No

167(50.2)

68(40.7)

99(59.3)

1

Yes

166(49.8)

59(35.8)

106(64.2)

0.81(0.52-1.26)

Frequency of exercise per week

<one time per week

195(58.6)

37(37.4)

62(62.6)

1

≥one time per week

138(41.4)

90(38.6)

143(61.4)

0.86(0.55-1.36)

  1. *Values in this table represent n and (%), except for age where means ± (SD) are presented+. One study participant had the question about the use of dietary counseling services missing and hence was only included in the overall descriptives and was excluded from the rest of the analysis.