Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Stakeholder perspectives on implementing accreditation programs: a qualitative study of enabling factors

Original Submission
19 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cornelia Sack
11 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fadi El-Jardali
8 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marius Brostrom Kousgaard
16 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Reece Hinchcliff
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fadi El-Jardali
19 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marius Brostrom Kousgaard
30 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Reece Hinchcliff
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Reece Hinchcliff
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marius Brostrom Kousgaard
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Oct 2013 Editorially accepted
24 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-437

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page