Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of participating optometrists by formal education

From: Sensitivity and specificity of Norwegian optometrists’ evaluation of diabetic retinopathy in single-field retinal images – a cross-sectional experimental study

  

Master of science in clinical optometrya

 

All (n=74)

No (n=51)

Yes (n=22)

Gender, n (%)

   

 Female

43 (58)

30 (59)

13 (59)

 Male

31 (42)

21 (41)

9 (41)

Number of years as practicing optometrist, mean (sd) **

12 (±9)

10 (±8)

16 (±8)

Preferred method of retinal examination, n (%)

   

 Undilated indirect ophthalmoscopy

35 (47)

22 (43)

13 (59)

 Retinal fundus photography

25 (34)

16 (31)

8 (36)

 Undilated direct ophthalmoscopy

9 (12)

9 (17)

0 (0)

 Other

5 (7)

4 (8)

1 (1)

Retinal examinations methods used in patients with diabetes, n (%)

   

 Undilated retinal photography

46 (62)

30 (59)

15 (68)

 Undilated indirect ophthalmoscopy*

39 (53)

23 (45)

16 (73)

 Dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy

15 (20)

9 (18)

6 (27)

 Dilated retinal photography

11 (15)

8 (16)

3 (14)

 Undilated direct ophthalmoscopy*

11 (15)

11 (22)

0 (0)

Available instruments for retinal examination and imaging, n (%)

   

 Direct ophthalmoscope and/or indirect slit-lamp ophthalmoscopy

71 (96)

48 (94)

22 (100)

 Retinal fundus camera

65 (88)

44 (86)

20 (91)

 Scanning-laser ophthalmoscope (Optomap)

19 (26)

10 (20)

9 (41)

  1. a Missing data for 1 participant.
  2. Student t-test P*<0.05 and P**<0.01 between optometrists with and without MSc in clinical optometry.