Table 4 Estimated adjusted Odds ratio, 95% Confidences intervals for odds ratio, and delta-p statistics for the final logistic regression model for high expenditures in city A (n:861).
From: Predictors of the highest long-term care expenditures in Japan
covariates | odds ratio | 95% CI | delta-p |
|---|---|---|---|
main effects | Â | Â | Â |
male | 1.00 | Â | Â |
female | 1.53 | (0.80, 3.02) | - |
< = 74 y-old | 1.00 | Â | Â |
75 -84 y-old | 5.23 | (2.03, 14.45) | 0.211 |
85-94 y-old | 3.75 | (1.46, 10,31) | 0.151 |
> = 95 y-old | 4.71 | (1.44, 16.15) | 0.193 |
low income | 1.00 | Â | Â |
middle income | 0.63 | (0.29, 1.41) | - |
high income | 0.85 | (0.28, 2.49) | - |
equal or decrease URB†| 1.00 |  |  |
increase URB†| 23.53 | (9.62, 63.99) | 0.575 |
unchanged functional status | 1.00 | Â | Â |
decline in functional status | 2.02 | (1.10, 3.77) | 0.137 |
low care needs level | 1.00 | Â | Â |
middle care needs level | 24.10 | (7.85, 106.77) | 0.426 |
interaction effect | Â | Â | Â |
high care needs level * facility | Â | Â | Â |
use facility services | 105.60 | (41.5, 268.7) | 0.654 |
use others services | 37.04 | (17.6, 77.9) | 0.325 |