Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Wan |
23 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gawaine Powell Davies |
3 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phil Cotterell |
3 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Blossom Yen-Ju Lin |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gawaine Powell Davies |
18 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Phil Cotterell |
28 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Blossom Yen-Ju Lin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Blossom Yen-Ju Lin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Blossom Yen-Ju Lin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
30 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Blossom Yen-Ju Lin |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
2 Apr 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Apr 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-87 |
You can find further information about peer review here.