Protocol for a two-arm pragmatic stepped-wedge hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating Engagement and Collaborative Management to Proactively Advance Sepsis Survivorship (ENCOMPASS)

Table 3 Summary of Outcome Measures for Evaluation of STAR Program Implementation

			Implementation time point
	Assessment	Evaluation tool	Pre	8 m	20 m	32 m	Post
CFIR Construct Assessed
Outer setting (Patient Needs and resources, Cosmopolitanism, external policies/incentives)	Administrative leaders	CFIR interviews	X				X
	Providers	CFIR interviews	X				X
Inner Setting (networks/communication, implementation climate, readiness)	Administrative leaders	CFIR interviews	X				X
	Providers	CFIR interviews	X	X	X	X	X
	Navigators	CFIR interviews		X	X	X
Intervention (evidence strength/quality, relative advantage, adaptability, trialability, complexity)	Administration	CFIR Interviews		X	X	X
	Providers	CFIR Interviews		X	X	X
	Navigators	CFIR Interviews		X	X	X
Individuals (knowledge and beliefs about intervention, self-efficacy)	Providers	Knowledge survey Self-Efficacy survey		X	X	X
	Navigators	Knowledge survey Self-Efficacy survey		X	X	X
	Patients and Caregivers	Knowledge survey Self-Efficacy survey		X	X	X
Process (execution)	Navigators	Focused ethnography		X	X	X
Other outcomes assessed
Reach, Adoption, and Maintenance	Patients (Reach)	1) Navigator use per eligible patients 2) risk prediction for those enrolled		X	X	X	X
Reach, Adoption, and Maintenance	Providers (Adoption)	# of providers with pts. enrolled		X	X	X	X
Effectiveness	Healthcare utilization	90-day mortality or readmission	X				X
Cost	Health system	Clinical trial data					X
Cost	Societal	Extrapolated					X

ISSN: 1472-6963