Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Burnout syndrome in healthcare professionals who care for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: a cross-sectional survey

BMC Health Services Research volume 20, Article number: 841 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Burnout is more common among healthcare professionals, that is an important problem of professional distress that can seriously affect healthcare professionals’ emotional state, health, medical quality and doctor-patient relationship. However, only few studies researched the burnout status of healthcare professionals who care for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of burnout and related contributing personal and environment factors in healthcare professionals managing these patients.

Methods

Institution-based cross-sectional study. Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey was used to evaluate burnout in professionals who specially care for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness in the neurorehabilitation department.

Results

A total of 200 questionnaires were distributed, 121 were collected, among them 93 questionnaires could be used for further analysis. In this study, 61 participants (65.6%) showed burnout (55.2% physicians and 82.9% nurses). For the risks and Maslach Burnout Inventory scores, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were correlated with age, gender, occupation, marital status, years of practice, and education level. Reduced personal accomplishment was correlated with marital status. The variables of age (< 29 years old), occupation (nurses), marital status (unmarried), years of practice (< 5 years), and educational level (≤ Undergraduate) were associated with high levels of burnout.

Conclusions

Healthcare professionals who care for patients with disorders of consciousness experienced high levels of burnout. Especially those who were younger, nurse, unmarried, less practice experience or lower educational levels were more likely to experience high burnout.

Peer Review reports

Background

Burnout syndrome is characterized by mental and emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a low sense of personal accomplishment [1]. Since the 1980s, scholars have carried out some studies in the field of job burnout of nurses in many medical specialties [1, 2]. This syndrome is prevalent and recognized as a major problem among healthcare professionals caring for critically ill patients, especially in the fields of psychiatry, geriatric care, emergency care, and surgical and intensive care [3]. It primarily reflects psychological pressure encountered in the work environment, which reduces the quality of life for healthcare staff and may even result in drug abuse, physical illness, depression, or death [4]. It was estimated that more than a third of healthcare professionals suffer from psychological morbidity according to specific risk factors, such as gender, marital status, age, job demands, medical specialty, and so on [5,6,7]. However, normally the process of burnout is slow and difficult to detect in its early stage, but it should be treated as a public health issue. Therefore, it is very important to focus on the mental health problems of healthcare professionals and evaluate risk factors for burnout in order to take preventive measures as early as possible. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) was designed to assess the frequency and intensity of perceived burnout among persons in the helping professionals in general [1, 8, 9]. It is also widely used in the study of physiological and psychological burnout of healthcare professionals [10,11,12,13].

Patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC) are those who are under the state of unconscious (coma, vegetative state/unresponsiveness wakefulness syndrome) and/or minimal conscious (minimally consciousness state). They may die or regain consciousness, or they may remain the state of unconscious or minimally conscious for longer [14]. Such patients also have the characteristics of more complications, especially infection. However, advances in medical care have led to higher survival rates and increased significantly in the number of patients with prolonged DOC. At the same time, it also brings great challenges to the healthcare staff engaged in this field. Previous studies found that family members or caregivers of patients with prolonged DOC experience significant pressure [15,16,17]. They are prone to job burnout, both physically and psychologically, and are subjected to stress loads that are more difficult to bear than those of the general caregivers in hospital setting. Furthermore, Gosseries et.al., [18] and Leonardi et.al., [19] found that a large number of professional caregivers suffer from moderate to low levels of burnout, especially nurses. However, there have been no other studies on burnout in healthcare professionals specifically working with prolonged DOC patients. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to investigate the burnout levels of healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) and to analyze the relationship between demographics and the occurrence of burnout for these professionals.

Methods

Using a quantitative and observational study design, the data were collected by MBI-HSS scale. This cross-sectional survey was carried out using convenience sampling at neuro-rehabilitation departments for patients with prolonged DOC in 4 provinces (Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Henan province, China).

Participants

The following inclusion criteria were applied: 1) the neuro-rehabilitation departments are mainly for patients with prolonged DOC after severe brain injury; 2) the healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) working in these department, not as medical students and incoming intern; 3) the age of healthcare professionals > 18 years old; 4) the years of practice with patients with prolonged DOC ≥ one year. The healthcare professionals were excluded from participation if they felt they had too little experience caring for prolonged DOC patients. The questionnaires were given to all healthcare professionals in the seven hospitals selected. All healthcare professionals working with these patients were recruited voluntarily and anonymously in this study.

Data collection

Data collection was carried out using the MBI-HSS scale (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment) [1, 8], which is the most widely used measurement for evaluating burnout syndrome. The demographic information (age, gender, occupation, marital status, years of practice, working hours per day, and education level) also be collected. The MBI-HSS scale has a high reliability and validity [1, 20, 21], and the Cronbach coefficient (α) of this study is 0.86. The MBI-HSS explores emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and the sensation of reduced personal accomplishment. The emotional exhaustion section mainly evaluates the emotional response caused by excessive work pressure, a feeling of being emotionally and physically overextended, and a loss of enthusiasm for work. The depersonalization element mainly evaluates the pressure caused by one’s attitude and feelings toward work, lack of feeling, cynical, callous, and impersonal responses toward patient care, reduced empathy, and increased cynicism. The personal accomplishment section mainly evaluates the pressure caused by the person’s view of his/her own work and feelings of competence and successful achievement; it also reflects how the person feels about the meaningfulness of his/her work. A total of 22 items from the MBI-HSS scale were used: the emotional exhaustion score included nine items with a score range of 0–54 (a score of < 19 was considered low burnout, 19–26 reflected moderate burnout, and > 26 reflected high burnout). Five items measured depersonalization with a score range of 0–30 points (< 6 reflected low burnout, 6–9 reflected moderate burnout, and > 9 indicated high burnout). The personal accomplishment evaluation included eight items with a score range of 0–48 points (> 39 reflected low burnout, 34–39 indicated moderate burnout, and < 34 reflected high burnout). All items were scored on a seven-point scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (every day). The total score of each dimension was classified as low, moderate, or high. In terms of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, persons with high scores were defined as having burnout; the higher the score, the stronger degree of burnout [1, 22,23,24].

Ethics statement

The study protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Hangzhou Normal University. The study was conducted according to the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants.

Statistical analysis

An evaluation of descriptive statistics was performed for all demographic information. Means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated for continuous variables, while numbers and percentages were produced for categorical variables.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) F-test comparison of score means and the least-significant difference (LSD) post-hoc analysis were used to compare the MBI-HSS scores using different variables (age, gender, occupation, marital status, years of practice, working hours per day, and education level) to determine whether there were any significant differences. About the linear-by-linear association of variables and burnout, Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were applied to investigate associations between variables and the presence of burnout in all participants and investigate associations between variables and the level of burnout within the MBI-HSS dimensions. Statistical significance was considered, and all statistical tests were two-sided (p < 0.05). All operations were done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0.

Results

Study and participant characteristics

A total of 200 questionnaires were distributed, and 121 were returned (60% response rate); blank and/or incomplete questionnaires (n = 28) were excluded from the further data analysis; and 93 valid questionnaires (46.5% effective response rate) were analyzed finally. The participants were between the ages of 20 and 62 years (34.58 ± 10.69), and the majority of them were female (60.2%), married (62.4%), physicians (62.4%). Most participants worked less than 10 h per day (72.0%). Nearly half participants had undergraduate degrees (50.5%) and one third participants had been working for less than five years (30.1%). The composition ratio of the participants’ demographic information is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Composition ratio of participants’ demographic information
Full size table

Burnout levels and estimated prevalence

61 participants (65.6%) showed burnout based on the MBI-HSS (i.e., the burnout was defined by high score on emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization subscale of the MBI-HSS) (see Table 2). Among them, the prevalence of burnout among the physicians was 55.2%; the prevalence of burnout among the nurses was 82.9%. The results of statistical analysis showed that the burnout of healthcare professionals was associated with age, occupation, marital status, and years of practice. In addition, burnout was more common in those healthcare professionals with the characters of younger (< 29 years old, 80.6%), nurses (82.9%), unmarried (85.7%), or less practice working experienced (< 5 years, 82.1%).

Table 2 Univariate analysis of MBI-HSS scores in relation to demographics profile of the healthcare professionals
Full size table

Furthermore, the mean scores of each MBI-HSS subscale for all participants showed moderate emotional exhaustion (mean scores 23.22 ± 9.05), high levels of depersonalization (mean scores 11.54 ± 5.12), and highly reduced personal accomplishment (mean scores 33.46 ± 7.45). The results of ANOVA revealed that the emotional exhaustion and depersonalization of persons were significantly different in age, occupation, gender, marital status, years of practice, and education level (see Table 3). The results of ANOVA also revealed that the sensation of reduced personal accomplishment significantly differed in Marital status (F = 4.208, p = 0.043). For each subscale in the emotional exhaustion analysis, post-hoc testing indicated that healthcare professionals younger than 29 years had the higher score compared to those from 30 to 39 years and over 50 years old (p = 0.045, p = 0.004, respectively). Those working practice less than five years had higher scores than those working between 5 and 10 years and over 20 years (p = 0.036, p = 0.009, respectively). For those with low education level (below undergraduate degree) had higher scores than those with undergraduate degrees and postgraduate degrees (p = 0.002, p = 0.018, respectively). For the depersonalization analysis, post-hoc test algorithms indicated that healthcare professionals younger than 29 years had the higher scores compared to those aged 20–29 years, 30–39 years, and over the age of 50 (p = 0.014, p = 0.002, p = 0.001, respectively). Those working practice less than five years had higher scores than those working practice over 20 years (p < 0.001), and those working less than five years had higher scores than those working 5 to 10 years (p = 0.022). Those people with low education level (below undergraduate degree) had the higher score compared to those with undergraduate degrees and postgraduate degrees (p = 0.01, p = 0.001, respectively). For the personal accomplishment analysis, post-hoc testing found that healthcare professionals with low experience level (below undergraduate degree) had lower scores than those with postgraduate degrees (p = 0.015).

Table 3 Univariate analysis of MBI-HSS scores in relation to demographic profiles of the healthcare professionals
Full size table

Table 4 showed the correlation between the variables and different levels of three MBI-HSS subscales (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment) among healthcare professionals. The demographic significant correlates of high emotional exhaustion were younger age (20–29 years old) (χ2 = 13.739, p = 0.027), nurses (χ2 = 12.799, p = 0.002), female (χ2 = 7.637, p = 0.022), and unmarried (χ2 = 9.492, p = 0.009). The demographic significant correlates of high depersonalization were younger age (20–29 years old) (χ2 = 15.231, p = 0.01), nurses (χ2 = 12.635, p = 0.002), unmarried (χ2 = 11.766, p = 0.003), and less working practice experience (χ2 = 14.851, p = 0.013). We did not find demographic significant correlates of lower sense of personal accomplishment in the current study. Table 4 illustrates that 28 professionals showed low score (30.1%), 35 showed moderate score (37.6%), and 30 (32.3%) showed a high score for the emotional exhaustion subscale; 10 healthcare professionals showed low score (10.8%), 28 showed moderate score 30.1%, and 55 (59.1%) showed high score for the depersonalization subscale; and 22 healthcare professionals showed high score (23.7%), 22 showed moderate score (23.7%), and 49 (52.6%) showed low score for the personal accomplishment subscale (see Fig. 1).

Table 4 Different levels of MBI-HSS and variables among healthcare workers
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentage of MBI-HSS subscale score (low, moderate and high score) for healthcare professionals working with patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness

Full size image

Discussion

Burnout among healthcare professionals may affect the realization of high-quality healthcare [25]. The present study investigated the level of burnout and analyzed the risk factors leading to burnout for healthcare professionals managing patients with prolonged DOC in hospitals. Overall, the findings highlighted the high incidence of these healthcare professionals. Besides, burnout was more common in those healthcare professionals with the characters of younger, nurses, unmarried, or less practice working experienced.

Some previous studies have confirmed significantly higher risks of depression, stress, emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and a low sense of personal accomplishment among physicians and nurses in the general medical field [26,27,28]. In the present study, all healthcare professionals were responsible for the management or care of patients with prolonged DOC. The current study found that more than half of participants experienced the level of burnout, which was significantly higher than previous studies [5,6,7, 29]. The uniqueness of prolonged DOC patients, such as lower recovery rates, heavier physical weight, higher family pressure, higher expectations of family members [30], and some other factors, may lead to the high incidence of burnout. When analyzing the risk factors of variables, the study found that there was significant difference between different age groups, occupation groups, gender, marital status, years of practice. 82.9% nurses had the burnout, which significantly higher than physicians had. It could be attributed to the self-selection of already highly motivated physicians and resilient physicians who specialize in this challenging field of medicine; this was similar to the results of some surgeons in previous studies [31, 32]. Nurses in prolonged DOC are a special occupational group who not only need to have a wealth of professional knowledge and operational skills, but also have strong psychological qualities. Thus, the stress borne by nurses has become an occupational hazard. Extant literature showed that nurses have the greatest mental health challenges among medical professionals because they are the closest to patients and family members and are under the most pressure from patients and their families [23, 33]. The heavy workload and the lack of understanding by patients and their families could easily lead to psychological imbalances for nurses in prolonged DOC, resulting in job burnout. Moreover, the results of present study indicate that the healthcare professionals with characters of younger (< 29 years old), unmarried, and/or less practice experience are more prone to burnout syndrome in prolonged DOC field.

On the whole, healthcare professionals in prolonged DOC experienced moderate emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, and highly reduced sense of personal accomplishment. The findings of present research were similar to the results of Hayes’s study in hemodialysis field [34], but it was significantly higher than the burnout rates of other healthcare professionals such as general practitioners and nurses [5,6,7]. Furthermore, this study continued to analyze the proportion of burnout level in each variable on the different dimension of MBI-HSS for healthcare professionals in prolonged DOC. Healthcare professionals with younger, female, nurses or unmarried characters were found to be more likely to experience emotional exhaustion. And high depersonalization was more likely to occur in participants with younger, female, unmarried, or less practice experience. In terms of their sense of reduced personal accomplishment, there is a clear difference between individuals with low educational levels and those with higher education levels [35]. That is, a lower level of education may be a risk factor for reduced personal accomplishment. Because, the medical healthcare professionals in medical field are generally highly educated, and the person with lower education usually cannot realize their own value. However, experienced professionals with high educational levels had less burnout, probably because they had adapted to the specialty and maintained effective coping skills [36, 37]. Therefore, professionals with low academic medical should be encouraged to further their education and improve their professional and educational level. As the result for the married status, the study found that unmarried professionals have a higher rate of burnout, so whether the support of a structure family is crucial to the psychological well-being of healthcare professionals. Preventive measures against risk factors might necessary to avoid the occurrence of burnout, such as coping skills interventions [38].

Limitations

Due to the small number of such healthcare professionals now, this study did not meet the standard of sample size, which is one of limitations. Besides, the majority of the staff were physicians, and this could also limit the further analysis of nurses. Additionally, this study is a cross-sectional survey, and despite applying correlation statistics between variables, it does not allow to discover the causal relationship between them.

Conclusions

Understanding job burnout and taking corresponding intervention measures are of great significance to maintain the health of healthcare professionals, reduce their turnover rate and stabilize the medical team. This study revealed that healthcare professionals who manage prolonged DOC patients experienced high levels of work-related burnout. Moreover, variables, such as age, gender, occupation, marital status, work experience, and education level, could related with the occurrence of burnout. Especially those who had these risk factors (i.e., younger, nurse, unmarried, less practice experience, or lower educational levels) were more likely to experience burnout. Hence, hospital authorities, society, and the government need to pay closer attention to these issues to improve the psychological well-being of professionals who care for prolonged DOC patients. In addition, this research provided some reference basis for the psychological adjustment and professional training of managers and medical staff [25], which is of great significance.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and /or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MBI-HSS:

Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey

DOC:

Disorders of consciousness

SD:

Standard deviations

LSD:

Least-significant difference

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

References

  1. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397–422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen SM, McMurray A. "burnout" in intensive care nurses. J Nurs Res. 2001;9(5):152–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ksiazek I, Stefaniak TJ, Stadnyk M, Ksiazek J. Burnout syndrome in surgical oncology and general surgery nurses: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(4):347–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hyman SA, Michaels DR, Berry JM, Schildcrout JS, Mercaldo ND, Weinger MB. Risk of burnout in perioperative clinicians: a survey study and literature review. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(1):194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calnan M, Wainwright D, Forsythe M, Wall B, Almond S. Mental health and stress in the workplace: the case of general practice in the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(4):499–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung T, Wong SY, Wong KY, Law LY, Ng K, Tong MT, Wong KY, Ng MY, Yip PS. Depression, anxiety and symptoms of stress among baccalaureate nursing students in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(8):779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mata DA, Ramos MA, Bansal N, Khan R, Guille C, Di Angelantonio E, Sen S. Prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms among resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;314(22):2373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwanicki EF, Schwab RL. A cross validation study of the Maslach burnout inventory. Educ Psycho Meas. 1981;41(4):1167–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalliath TJ, O'Driscoll MP, Gillespie DF, Bluedorn AC. A test of the Maslach burnout inventory in three samples of healthcare professionals. Work Stress. 2000;14(1):35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pisanti R, Lombardo C, Lucidi F, Violani C, Lazzari D. Psychometric properties of the Maslach burnout inventory for human services among Italian nurses: a test of alternative models. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(3):697–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iftadi I, Astuti RD, Rosita M. Using NASA task load index and Maslach burnout inventory for evaluating the subjective mental and physical workload of nurse central surgical installation hospitals Karanganyar. 2016 2nd International Conference of Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical, and Chemical Engineering (ICIMECE). Yogyakarta: IEEE. 2016. p. 127–31. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1109/ICIMECE.2016.7910438.

  13. Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Donis J, Kraftner B. The prevalence of patients in a vegetative state and minimally conscious state in nursing homes in Austria. Brain Inj. 2011;25(11):1101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stern JM, Sazbon L, Becker E, Costeff H. Severe behavioural disturbance in families of patients with prolonged coma. Brain Inj. 1988;2(3):259–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morena MJ, De La E, Cruzado JA. Caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: coping and prolonged grief. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;127(6):413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Romaniello C, Farinelli M, Matera N, Bertoletti E, Pedone V, Northoff G. Anxious attachment style and hopelessness as predictors of burden in caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2015;18(4):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gosseries O, Demertzi A, Ledoux D, Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Laureys S, Schnakers C. Burnout in healthcare workers managing chronic patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj. 2012;26(12):1493–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonardi M, Pagani M, Giovannetti AM, Raggi A, Sattin D. Burnout in healthcare professionals working with patients with disorders of consciousness. Work. 2013;45(3):349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilfedder CJ, Power KG, Wells TJ. Burnout in psychiatric nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2001;34(3):383–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Coker A, Omoluabi P. Validation of maslach burnout inventory. IFE PsychologIA: An International Journal. 2009;17(1):231–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahraian A, Fazelzadeh A, Mehdizadeh AR, Toobaee SH. Burnout in hospital nurses: a comparison of internal, surgery, psychiatry and burns wards. Int Nurs Rev. 2008;55(1):62–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shanafelt TD, Bradley KA, Wipf JE, Back AL. Burnout and self-reported patient care in an internal medicine residency program. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(5):358–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luan X, Wang P, Hou W, Chen L, Lou F. Job stress and burnout: a comparative study of senior and head nurses in China. Nurs Health Sci. 2017;19(2):163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1714–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuhn CM, Flanagan EM. Self-care as a professional imperative: physician burnout, depression, and suicide. Can J Anaesth. 2017;64(2):158–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang CL, Weng SF, Wang JJ, Hsu YW, Wu MP. Risks of treated insomnia, anxiety, and depression in health care-seeking physicians: a nationwide population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(35):e1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chan CM, Wan Ahmad WA, Yusof MM, Ho GF, Krupat E. Patient-centredness, job satisfaction and psychological distress: a brief survey comparing oncology nurses and doctors. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(16):6895–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Paiva LC, Acg CR, Elc DPC, Gonçalves AK. Burnout syndrome in health-care professionals in a university hospital. Clinics. 2017;72(5):305–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Whyte J, Ashman EJ, Ashwal S, Barbano R, Hammond FM, Laureys S, Ling GSF, et al. Comprehensive systematic review update summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American congress of rehabilitation medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018;91(10):461–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Balch CM, Shanafelt TD. Burnout among surgeons: whether specialty makes a difference. Arch Surg. 2011;146(4):385–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Siau CS, Wee L-H, Ibrahim N, Visvalingam U, Ling Yeap L, Yeoh S, Wahab S. Predicting burnout and psychological distress risks of hospital healthcare workers. Malaysian J Public Health Med. 2018;2018:125–36.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sears SF Jr, Urizar GG Jr, Evans GD. Examining a stress-coping model of burnout and depression in extension agents. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(1):56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hayes B, Douglas C, Bonner A. Work environment, job satisfaction, stress and burnout among haemodialysis nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2015;23(5):588–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trufelli DC, Bensi CG, Garcia JB, Narahara JL, Abrao MN, Diniz RW, Miranda Vda C, Soares HP, Del Giglio A. Burnout in cancer professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008;17(6):524–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Howlett M, Doody K, Murray J, LeBlanc-Duchin D, Fraser J, Atkinson PR. Burnout in emergency department healthcare professionals is associated with coping style: a cross-sectional survey. Emerg Med J. 2015;32(9):722–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nowakowska-Domagala K, Jablkowska-Gorecka K, Kostrzanowska-Jarmakowska L, Morton M, Stecz P. The interrelationships of coping styles and professional burnout among physiotherapists: a cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(24):e906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ewers P, Bradshaw T, McGovern J, Ewers B. Does training in psychosocial interventions reduce burnout rates in forensic nurses? J Adv Nurs. 2002;37(5):470–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors warmly thank all population who participated in this survey. The authors would like to thank especially Yunzhi Nie, Wangshan Huang and Yingjie Ling for their efforts and help in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81920108023), Hangzhou Normal University (2018PYXML007), Zhejiang Province Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Program Project (2018ZB101), Zhejiang Basic Public Interest Research Program Project (LGF20H090017), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Program for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement (Human Brain Project SGA2, 785907), the fund Generet, the King Baudouin Foundation, and the DOCMA project (EU-H2020-MSCA-RISE-778234). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 310036, China

    Jing Wang, Wenting Wang & Haibo Di

  2. Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Steven Laureys

Authors
  1. Jing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenting Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven Laureys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haibo Di
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WW, JW, HD and SL made substantive intellectual contributions to the design of the study. WW made outstanding contributions to the collection of data. JW provided help to the analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising the manuscript. HD worked iteratively on the revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haibo Di.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Hangzhou Normal University. The study was conducted according to the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Wang, W., Laureys, S. et al. Burnout syndrome in healthcare professionals who care for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 841 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-020-05694-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-020-05694-5

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us