Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effects of a rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in Shanghai, China

BMC Health Services Research volume 20, Article number: 298 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Specialized Institution-Based Rehabilitation (SIBR) is the cornerstone of care and treatment for individuals with spinal cord injury, but most people with chronic spinal cord injury (CSCI) living in China have no SIBR experience after acute care hospital discharge. In 2009, an SIBR facility was set up in Shanghai (China) to fill this important gap in care. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated rehabilitation training program among individuals with CSCI living in Shanghai.

Methods

A within-subject pre-posttest design was used to evaluate the SIBR. The sample included 455 individuals ≥1 year post-SCI, who were older than 18 years of age and were enrolled in a rehabilitation center in Shanghai, China, between 2013 and 2019. The data included individuals’ sociodemographic and injury characteristics, and twenty-three indicators were used as outcome measurements to evaluate basic life skills and their applications in family and social life. Multivariate linear regression was conducted to determine which factors might have influenced the effectiveness of the SIBR.

Results

All basic life skills and their applications in family and social life were improved, but with variations across socio-demographics. Female individuals with CSCI had better outcomes in basic life skills than did males. In terms of basic life skills and their applications in family and social life, individuals with a low level (thoracic or lumbosacral) of injury achieved more significant functional gains than those with a higher level (cervical). The baseline score was also a relevant factor in functional outcome.

Conclusions

Even for individuals with a long SCI history, SIBR training can improve basic life skills and the applications of those skills in family and social life settings.

Peer Review reports

Background

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is defined as an injury in which the structures and function of the spinal cord are damaged due to traumatic or non-traumatic causes [1]. It is estimated that approximately 1.3 million individuals with SCI lived in China in 2012, and the reported incidence rates were 13–60 per million [2]. Although SCI is not curable [3], an individual’s Quality of Life (QoL) can be improved with timely, reasonable, and comprehensive rehabilitation services [4]. It is clear that rehabilitation training should start right after the injury to achieve better health outcomes for individuals with SCI [4,5,6]. However, emerging research suggests that late-start rehabilitation can still be effective [7, 8]. In developed countries, most individuals with SCI are admitted to inpatient rehabilitation centers directly from acute care [9] and typically receive at least 2–3 months of rehabilitation treatment [10]. Thereafter, they can continue to receive on-going family-supported rehabilitation, community rehabilitation, or specialized institution-based rehabilitation (SIBR) [11] with the aim of prevention of complications, family and community integration, etc. However, as a developing country, China has limited resources to provide rehabilitation services to individuals with SCI [12, 13]. They can receive some hospital-based rehabilitation services after the onset of injury that focus on body function improvement, complication prevention education, muscle strength exercise, and range of motion (ROM) training, then they return home with limited information and skills necessary for maintaining optimal health and well-being.

Before 2009, however, most people with SCI did not have access to any services after acute care hospital discharge. In 2009, the China Association of Persons with Physical Disability, a government-supported national organization, started community co-op centers called “halfway houses” for individuals with SCI in four provinces: Shanghai, Zhejiang, Henan, and Guangxi [14]. Halfway houses are the platform for community-based rehabilitation (CBR) for individuals with SCI. To better serve the individuals in Shanghai, an inpatient training center was set up that same year in the Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center, SSRC), the only city-level specialized rehabilitation center in that province. The facility is responsible for providing SIBR training for individuals with SCI who need to improve their QoL and reintegrate into their communities, with all costs being paid by the Shanghai Disabled Persons’ Federation, a semi-government organization, which helps to ensure affordability, availability, and ease of administration. Chang et al. [14] reported that the mean time from injury to halfway house enrollment was 12.8 years in Shanghai between 2009 and 2015, which suggested that a majority of the enrollees had been managing their injuries for a long time without benefit of timely rehabilitation services. Considering the severity of the injury in those with SCI, SIBR should be the cornerstone of rehabilitation [15].

There has been extensive research into SCI rehabilitation in developed countries [16, 17]. However, existing research on SCI rehabilitation in China focuses on acute or sub-acute hospital-based interventions [18,19,20], and little research has examined the effectiveness of CBRs in China [21, 22]; to the best of our knowledge, the effects of an SIBR service for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (CSCI) have not yet been studied in China. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the SIBR program for individuals with CSCI, meaning those who had lived with SCI for at least 1 year, at the training center in the SSRC and answered two questions: (1) What is the effect of rehabilitation on basic life skills and their applications in family and social life? (2) What are the factors that may change rehabilitation effectiveness after controlling for an individual’s functional level at admission to rehabilitation? We hypothesized that individuals with CSCI would likely experience therapeutic gains by participating in the program in the SSRC. We also investigated whether demographic and injury factors predicted rehabilitation effectiveness, for example, whether individuals with low levels of injury might acquire greater functional improvement compared with those with high levels of injury, and whether a shorter time since injury onset to admission in an SIBR program could bring better outcomes, etc. The study provides initial evidence in support of the establishment of further facilities and services in Shanghai and other developed regions in China to improve the welfare of individuals with SCI.

Methods

Participants

For the present study, a within-subject pre-posttest design was used. Inclusion criteria for participants included: (a) adult (between 18 and 70 years old), and (b) had lived with SCI for at least 1 year. Adults with severe medical co-morbidities, cognitive impairment, or mental disability were ineligible. Due to safety considerations and limited resources, the training program in the SSRC had no ability to provide services for individuals with tetraplegia whose injury level was higher than C5 (the fifth segment of the cervical spinal cord). A total of 455 individuals with CSCI who participated in rehabilitation training sessions in the SSRC between 2013 and 2019 were recruited into the study. These individuals were enrolled in the study from communities throughout 16 districts in Shanghai. Informed consent was obtained before arriving at the SSRC and was recorded on admission.

Description of the intervention

To ensure the quality of rehabilitation training, the SSRC rehabilitation team designed an integrated rehabilitation training program based on the “biopsychosocial model” of disability of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) [23] that focuses on the improvement of physical, psychological, and social functions of individuals with SCI. The contents of the program mainly included rehabilitation education and function reconstruction training in physical, psychological, and social functions [24,25,26].

Rehabilitation education covers an introduction to the spine and spinal cord, SCI and its rehabilitation, prevention of complications, bladder and bowel management, adaption and use of assistive devices, and strategies for creating barrier-free housing and environments. Body function reconstruction training includes physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT), which deals with muscle strength exercise, ROM, activities of daily living (ADLs), and wheelchair skills training, etc. Rehabilitation nursing training includes bladder and bowel management, personal hygiene, and the management of skin and body position. Psychological adjustment training consists of self-recognition, handling of emotions, interpersonal relationships, and social life adaptation after injury.

During the 45-day inpatient training period, individuals with SCI stayed in the SSRC and received training at different locations in or outside of the facility. Outside locations included supermarkets, movie theaters, restaurants, and subway stations, which were used to improve the social adaptability of patients. Due to the limited space in the SSRC training center, no more than 20 individuals were enrolled in each training session. A total of six training sessions were held each year. Every individual with SCI received a baseline evaluation in the first days after admission, after which the training was individualized according to the neurological level of injury, personal needs, and baseline function evaluation results. Personal needs were assessed by interview and group discussion by the training team. Each individual received a personalized schedule, which normally included 2 h of training (one session) in the morning and 3 h of training (two sessions) in the afternoon. Each person received a total of 90 training and education sessions (physical: 52 sessions / 84 h; social: 26 sessions / 44 h; psychological: 6 sessions / 12 h; summary and evaluation: 6 sessions / 10 h), with total sessions lasting for 150 h. Training and education methods included group discussion, demonstrations, role-playing, and practice.

The training team consisted of rehabilitation doctors and nurses, occupational therapists, physical therapists, psychological therapists, and social workers who had received a relevant bachelor’s degree or above and who had more than 5 years of SCI rehabilitation-related work experience. They received a two-week training before administering the intervention. In each term, two peer mentors joined the team as teaching assistants. These teaching assistants were required to have completed at least one training session successfully and to be able to facilitate communications between the SSRC rehabilitation team and individuals with SCI. Moreover, these teaching assistants were role models for newly enrolled trainees and helped the trainees learn rehabilitation skills in a timely fashion via demonstration.

Data and measurement

This study used the same data and outcome measures as our previous study that has been published [27]. The evaluation tables and criteria are attached in the Additional file 1.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics and frequencies were calculated for socio-demographic and impairment characteristics. The Wilcoxon test of paired samples was used to evaluate the significance of the differences in median admission and discharge scores on basic life skills and their applications in family and social life [28]. Six separate multivariate linear regression models were run for our outcome measures. The dependent variables were the motor score, cognition and emotion score, total score on basic life skills, applications of basic life skills in family and social life score, and the total score of the basic life skills applications in family and social life. We included seven independent variables in the regressions. To control for the confounding effect of baseline-to-discharge scores [29], the baseline score of the dependent variable was added in the regression. Except for age on admission, time from injury to beginning rehabilitation training, and the baseline score of the dependent variable, all other independent variables were dichotomized: sex (0 = male; 1 = female), educational background (0 = junior high school or below; 1 = senior high school/secondary vocational school/junior or regular college), marital status (0 = single/divorced/widowed; 1 = married/common-law), neurological level of injury (0 = cervical cord; 1 = thoracic or lumbosacral cord), and etiology (0 = non-traumatic; 1 = traumatic). All statistical tests were two-sided. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and no adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS for Windows 13.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data.

Results

Sociodemographic and impairment characteristics

The demographic and injury characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. Among the 455 individuals with CSCI, the male: female ratio was 1.76:1. The mean age (± SD) on admission was 46.2 ± 13.1 years. The mean age at injury (± SD) was 35.3 ± 15.2 years. The mean time (± SD) from injury to beginning rehabilitation training in the SSRC was 10.9 ± 12.2 years.

Table 1 Personal and injury characteristics of 455 individuals with chronic SCI
Full size table

Functional improvement of basic life skills and their applications in family and social life

The median total basic life skills score increased by 14.1% between pre-integrated rehabilitation training to post-training (p <  0.01, Table 2), and the median total score of motor function increased to 70 at discharge from 61 on admission, with statistical significance. However, the median total cognition and emotion score was fixed at 18 from admission to discharge, which may be related to the high baseline score. Bar charts (Fig. 1) are used to show the median scores on admission and discharge for each item of the evaluation of basic life skills and their applications in family and social life. Among all skills, the median score increase was the greatest in toileting (40%) and bath transfer (40%, Table 2 and Fig. 1-a). For wheelchair (locomotion), bathing, upper limb dressing, toilet transfer and bed/chair/wheelchair transfer, there was an increase of 1 point (16.7–25.0%). However, the median scores did not increase for eating, grooming, or lower limb dressing because of a ceiling effect (Table 2 and Fig. 1-a). For the three cognition and emotion items, the median scores also did not increase. Owing to the fact that the majority of individuals with CSCI in this study were wheelchair dependent, the median scores of walking and use of stairs were fixed at 1. In addition to walking and using stairs, the score of wheelchair use (locomotion) at discharge ranked last (Table 2 and Fig. 1-a) among all basic life skills.

Table 2 Admission and discharge scores of basic life skills and their applications in family and social life, by individual variables
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Bar charts showing admission and discharge scores in basic life skills and their applications in family and social life by individual variable (a: Basic life skills; b: Basic life skills applications in family and social life)

Full size image

The scores of basic life skills applications in family and social life improved significantly (p <  0.01, Table 2) from pre- to post-test, and the percentage increase in the median total scores of basic life skills applications in family and social life was 37.5 and 17.6%, respectively. The increase among the eight indicators of family and social life score was the greatest in wheelchair use (100.0%, Table 2 and Fig. 1-b) and housework (50.0%); however, the discharge score was the lowest in housework, with a 1-point increase (Table 2 and Fig. 1-b).

By examining the range of the scores (Table 2), we noticed that after rehabilitation training, the lowest scores of some items of basic life skills applications in social life increased by 1 to 2 points, such as arrival at destination and completion of tasks. However, the scores of many more items were still low, such as all the motor skills, housework, and wheelchair use, which indicated that rehabilitation training may not have improved basic life skills and their applications in family and social life in some individuals with CSCI.

Related factor analyses of functional improvement

The regression results showed that sex and the level of injury were significant predictors of improved motor scores (Table 3). Female individuals with CSCI showed greater improvement than male peers in basic life skills (motor: β = 0.12, p = 0.01; cognition and emotion: β = 0.08, p = 0.046). Compared with individuals with a high neurological level of injury, the motor score of individuals with low injury level (thoracic and lumbosacral cord) increased more significantly (β = 0.32, p <  0.01). None of the factors except for sex and baseline score were related to cognitive and emotional score improvement (p > 0.05). For basic life skills as a whole, the pattern was similar to motor function, where sex and level of injury were the two related factors. The results showed that the age, time span since injury, educational background, etiology and marital status were not significant predictors of functional improvement in basic life skills (p > 0.05). The proportions of the variance (R2) explained by the models were 34% (motor score), 39% (cognition and emotion score), and 35% (total basic life skills score), separately.

Table 3 Linear regression analyses of determinants of functional improvement in basic life skills of individuals with chronic SCI
Full size table

With regards to basic life skills applications in family and social life, thoracic and lumbosacral cord injury was the only factor related to the effect of training (p <  0.01, Table 4); i.e., the individuals with a lower injury level achieved more improvement in the applications of basic life skills in family and social life than did individuals with a higher level of SCI. However, six other factors also affected the functional outcome of basic life skills applications in family and social life, though without significance (Table 4). Moreover, the baseline score of basic life skills and their applications in family and social life was also a related factor (p <  0.01). The proportions of the variance explained by the models were 40% (family life), 39% (social life), and 39% (total application score), separately.

Table 4 Linear regression analyses of determinants of functional improvement of basic life skills applications in family and social life
Full size table

Discussion

The goal of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a novel SIBR training program in China designed to improve outcomes in individuals with CSCI. Our results suggest that SIBR training is an effective intervention to improve abilities in basic life skills and their applications in family and social life, even for individuals with a long SCI history [7]. Wheelchair use, housework, toileting, and bath transfer were the four items that showed relatively the most improvement. However, the gains in skills were not consistent across all domains, and some family and social skill items still needed further attention. The results were consistent with a previous study in Australia [16], which described significant motor FIM score improvement in inpatient rehabilitation for adults of SCI. Of course, the fact that scores did not change for eating, grooming, walking, and using stairs is to be expected [16, 30]. More research is needed to understand how to improve these scores further within the SIBR and CBR settings.

Female individuals with CSCI acquired more improvement in basic life skills than their male counterparts. The possible reason is that women may have more natural neurologic recovery than men [31]. However, Teeter et al. reported that being male was the predictive variable for the motor FIM score at discharge from initial rehabilitation and at 1 year post-injury for patients with paraplegia [32].

Individuals with thoracic and lumbosacral cord injuries had a better outcome in motor function and basic life skills applications in family and social life than those with cervical cord injuries. Similar results were seen in a study of rehabilitation hospitals in the USA, where the level was the predictor of motor FIM at discharge and 1-year post-injury [33].

Studies from Canada [34] and the USA [33] revealed that injury age and time from injury to rehabilitation admission were negative predictors to discharge, 1-year and 2-year post-injury FIM scores. However, this study suggested that age on admission was a factor related to motor score, though with no statistical significance, and the same was true for the time from injury to rehabilitation admission.

Both this study and one conducted in India [35] reported there was statistically no significant difference in the functional outcome between individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI after inpatient rehabilitation. However, a previous study has shown that patients with traumatic SCI achieved greater overall functional improvement than non-traumatic SCI in the USA within 60 days of injury [36]. The current study demonstrated that educational background on admission was not related to functional outcome of SIBR for individuals with CSCI. However, a previous study has shown that higher pre-injury education levels predicted higher FIM scores at 1 year post-injury [32].

This study has implications for policy makers. First, for individuals with SCI, it is never too late to start rehabilitation. People with SCI should be given on-going rehabilitation service to help them enjoy a long and full life [4, 37]. Our research provided further evidence of the value of late-start rehabilitation [7, 8], since individuals with SCI in our study had been injured an average of 10.9 years earlier but still improved in certain functions after rehabilitation training. Since Shanghai’s GDP per capita reached USD$20,000 in 2018, making it equivalent to the threshold level of the developed economies, the city government could conceivably reallocate more resources to provide rehabilitation training for more individuals with SCI. Hospitals may then refer newly injured individuals with SCI to the SSRC to receive timely rehabilitation training after discharge, and individuals with SCI in communities who have not participated in rehabilitation training can also be recommended to the SSRC in a timely manner. A model facilitating referral and coordination between hospitals, specialized rehabilitation institutions, and communities is essential for fulfilling this goal [38, 39]. In short, this study is based on a representative sample of individuals with CSCI participating in rehabilitation training at the SSRC. Findings from this study will help the SSRC as well as the Shanghai government and other developed regions to allocate more resources in the SIBR area.

The second implication of this study is that the long-term goal of rehabilitation is always to promote social inclusiveness and help individuals with SCI reintegrate into their society [40]. Although the direction of change for individuals with SCIs in China has been positive, we still have a long way to go to meet the needs of current and future individuals with this condition [41,42,43].

Finally, after the participants in this study received integrated rehabilitation training in the SSRC, they were able to share their experiences and basic life skills with other individuals with SCI in their local communities, which would tend to strengthen the community-wide effects of rehabilitation training [44, 45]. Newly injured individuals with SCI might apply for admission to rehabilitation training in the SSRC under the influence of our trainees.

This study has a few limitations. First, the sample size was limited due to the relatively low incidence of SCI and the limited service capacity of the SSRC training center. Therefore, the factors that did not demonstrate statistical significance in this study should not be excluded from future research. Second, the explained variance (R-square) was relatively low for regression analyses. This could be partly traced to the fact that because of limited resources for data collection, we could not obtain information on training processes, caregivers, and other social supports or follow-up outcomes. More independent variables and larger sample sizes could result in a higher R-square. Third, the severity of injury based on ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) classification was not collected. Fourth, this study was a pre-post study, so its external validity is limited. A more rigorous study design, such as a randomized controlled trial (RCT), should be implemented to establish causal relationships.

Conclusions

In summary, this study evaluates the rehabilitation outcomes of 455 individuals with CSCI who participated in integrated rehabilitation training in the SSRC. Our results suggest that even for individuals with a long SCI history, rehabilitation training can still improve their basic life skills and the applications of those skills in family and social life. Therefore, our study provides preliminary evidence to support the value of SIBR for individuals with SCI in Shanghai. Since many other regions in China have reached a level of economic development similar to Shanghai, the model in Shanghai could be recommended for those regions.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to our data policy, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SCI:

Spinal cord injury

CSCI:

Chronic spinal cord injury

CBR:

Community-based rehabilitation

SSRC:

Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center

SIBR:

Specialized Institution-Based Rehabilitation

ICF:

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

PT:

Physical therapy

OT:

Occupational therapy

ROM:

Range of motion

ADL:

Activities of daily living

FIM:

Functional independence measurement

SD:

Standard deviations

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

QoL:

Quality of life

ASIA:

American Spinal Injury Association

References

  1. Yang R, Guo L, Wang P, Huang L, Tang Y, Wang WH, et al. Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries and risk factors for complete injuries in Guangdong, China: a retrospective study. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84733.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen XY, Chen D, Chen CH, Wang K, Tang L, Li YZ, et al. The epidemiology and disease burden of traumatic spinal cord injury in China: a systematic review [article in China]. Chin J Evidence-Based Med. 2018;18:143–50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Silva NA, Sousa N, Reis RL, Salgado AJ. From basics to clinical: a comprehensive review on spinal cord injury. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;114:25–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hachem LD, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: from point of injury to rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40(6):665–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. DeVivo MJ, Kartus PL, Stover SL, Fine PR. Benefits of early admission to an organised spinal cord injury care system. Paraplegia. 1990;28(9):545–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Aarabi B, Anderson P, Arnold PM, Brodke DS, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury: recommendations on the type and timing of rehabilitation. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3 Suppl):231–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scivoletto G, Morganti B, Cosentino E, Molinari M. Utility of delayed spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an Italian study. Neurol Sci. 2006;27(2):86–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu AC, Yarkony GM. Benefits of rehabilitation for traumatic spinal cord injury: a case report. J Spinal Cord Med. 1996;19(1):17–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Granger CV, Karmarkar AM, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Niewczyk P, Divita MA, et al. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2002-2010. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(4):289–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Osterthun R, Post MW, van Asbeck FW. Characteristics, length of stay and functional outcome of patients with spinal cord injury in Dutch and Flemish rehabilitation centres. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(4):339–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang ML, Li JJ, Li Q, Qiu ZY, Chen C, Gao F, et al. Clinic and rehabilitation pathway recommendation for spine and spinal cord injury [article in China]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2012;18:791–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Liu G, Zheng Y, Hao C, Zhang Y, Wei B, et al. The epidemiological survey of acute traumatic spinal cord injury (ATSCI) of 2002 in Beijing municipality. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(7):777–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang D, Wu X, Shi G, Wang Y. China's first total care unit for the spinal cord injured. Paraplegia. 1990;28(5):318–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang FS, Zhang Q, Sun M, Yu HJ, Hu LJ, Wu JH, et al. Epidemiological study of spinal cord injury individuals from halfway houses in Shanghai. China J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;41(4):450–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guttmann L. Organisation of spinal units. History of the National Spinal Injuries Centre, stoke Mandeville hospital, Aylesbury. Paraplegia. 1967;5(3):115–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Turner-Stokes L, Vanderstay R, Stevermuer T, Simmonds F, Khan F, Eagar K. Comparison of rehabilitation outcomes for long term neurological conditions: a cohort analysis of the Australian rehabilitation outcomes Centre dataset for adults of working age. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e132275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guihan M, Bombardier CH, Ehde DM, Rapacki LM, Rogers TJ, Bates-Jensen B, et al. Comparing multicomponent interventions to improve skin care behaviors and prevent recurrence in veterans hospitalized for severe pressure ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(7):1246–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gou LJ, Xu SQ, Liu XD, Li LL, Xue L, Wang SJ. Effects of early rehabilitation on functional recovery and complications among patients with spinal cord injury [article in China]. Chin J Gerontol. 2014;34:313–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y, Reinhardt JD, Gosney JE, Zhang X, Hu X, Chen S, et al. Evaluation of functional outcomes of physical rehabilitation and medical complications in spinal cord injury victims of the Sichuan earthquake. J Rehab Med. 2012;44(7):534–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li X. The relationship between intervention time and effect of the early rehabilitation for patients with spinal cord injury [article in China]. Gansu Medical Journal. 2018;37(8):733–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin HM. Effectiveness analysis halfway house community-based rehabilitation program for patients with spinal cord injury [article in China]. J Nurs Sci. 2012;27(24):83–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zong HY, He Y, Guo H, Ding MF, Hu RQ, Xiao ZZ, Wang XH. Exploration of referral patterns for rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury in community hospitals [article in China]. West China Med J. 2017;32(3):404–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hou CL, Fan ZP, Wang SB. Guideline for spinal cord injury rehabilitation [in Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xu FJ. Guide book for rehabilitation of Halfway House of spinal cord injury patients [in Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhai H, Liu J. Guide to life reconstruction of persons with spinal cord injury [in Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chang FS, Zhang Q, Xie HX, Yang YH, Shen C, Shen XY, et al. The effects of two periods of rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injury from Shanghai. China Spinal Cord. 2020;58(2):216–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Svensson E. Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. J Rehab Med. 2001;33(1):47–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rinkaewkan P, Kuptniratsaikul V. The effectiveness of inpatients rehabilitation for spinal cord patients in Siriraj hospital. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(8):591–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cano SJ, O'Connor RJ, Thompson AJ, Hobart JC. Exploring disability rating scale responsiveness II: do more response options help? Neurology. 2006;67(11):2056–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sipski ML, Jackson AB, Gómez-Marín O, Estores I, Stein A. Effects of gender on neurologic and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(11):1826–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Teeter L, Gassaway J, Taylor S, LaBarbera J, McDowell S, Backus D, et al. Relationship of physical therapy inpatient rehabilitation interventions and patient characteristics to outcomes following spinal cord injury: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(6):503–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Whiteneck G, Gassaway J, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, Kreider SE. Relationship of patient characteristics and rehabilitation services to outcomes following spinal cord injury: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(6):484–502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Saboe LA, Darrah JM, Pain KS, Guthrie J. Early predictors of functional independence 2 years after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(6):644–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gupta A, Taly AB, Srivastava A, Vishal S, Murali T. Traumatic vs non-traumatic spinal cord lesions: comparison of neurological and functional outcome after inpatient rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(7):482–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McKinley WO, Seel RT, Gadi RK, Tewksbury MA. Nontraumatic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation outcome comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(9):693–9 700, 716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. World Health Organization. International perspectives on spinal cord injury. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang QH, Cheng HX, Shen L, He ZM, Lu ZG, et al. Effect of hospital-community-home integrated nursing model on functional recovery of patients with spinal cord injury [article in China]. Shanghai Nursing. 2018;18(4):28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pagliacci MC, Celani MG, Spizzichino L, Zampolini M, Aito S, Citterio A, et al. Spinal cord lesion management in Italy: a 2-year survey. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(11):620–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Silver J, Ljungberg I, Libin A, Groah S. Barriers for individuals with spinal cord injury returning to the community: a preliminary classification. Disabil Health J. 2012;5(3):190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferdiana A, Post MW, de Groot S, Bultmann U, van der Klink JJ. Predictors of return to work 5 years after discharge for wheelchair-dependent individuals with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(10):984–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schonherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Schoppen T, Eisma WH. Vocational reintegration following spinal cord injury: expectations, participation and interventions. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(3):177–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lawrence DW, Stewart GW. Evaluation of a program of university placement for spinal cord injured rehabilitation clients in Louisiana. J La State Med Soc. 1997;149(9):331–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. He DM, He YJ. Study on the application of peer education in patients with intermittent catheterization of spinal cord injury [article in China]. Today Nurse. 2019;26(3):155–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Divanoglou A, Trok K, Jorgensen S, Hultling C, Sekakela K, Tasiemski T. Active rehabilitation for persons with spinal cord injury in Botswana - effects of a community peer-based programme. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(10):897–905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express thanks to Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center (SSRC) for their help in collecting data. We sincerely thank all the individuals with CSCI participating in this study for their help in advancing SCI rehabilitation research in China.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant No. 71673052]; the China Scholarship Council [grant No. 201506105030]; the Shanghai Pujiang Program of the Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau [grant No. 17PJC003]; a project of key disciplines construction from the Shanghai Disabled Persons’ Federation [grant No. 2015–139]; the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period [grant No. 2014BAI08B01]; the 111 Project [grant No. B16031]; and a major project of the National Social Science Fund of China [grant No. 17ZDA078]. The funding body did not play any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Research Center on Disability, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Fengshui Chang, Yuhui Yang, Mei Sun, Gang Chen, Chengyue Li & Jun Lu

  2. School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA

    Qi Zhang

  3. Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai, China

    Haixia Xie, Airong Wu & Feng Shen

  4. Shanghai Disabled Persons’ Federation, Shanghai, China

    Jinghua Wu

Authors
  1. Fengshui Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haixia Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuhui Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Airong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinghua Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Feng Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chengyue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jun Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FC and QZ conceived the idea and acquired funding. HX, JL, and JW substantially contributed to the design of the study and to the acquisition of data. MS and YY supervised data collection and performed data cleaning. AW, GC, FS, and CL participated in the statistical analysis and interpretation of the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was granted from the ethics committee of the School of Public Health at Fudan University (IRB#2017-09-0633). Written informed consents from all participants were obtained prior to survey.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Evaluation Tables and Criteria

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, F., Zhang, Q., Xie, H. et al. Effects of a rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in Shanghai, China. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 298 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-020-05181-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-020-05181-x

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us