Skip to main content

Table 1 Factors examined with regards to History of having organised Professional Interpreters

From: Barriers to and solutions for addressing insufficient professional interpreter use in primary healthcare

Explanatory variables

Organised Interpreters

Adj. OR

p-value

No

Yes

Total

  

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

  

274 (55.0)

224 (45.0)

498

  

Type of primary care provider

 Family doctor

176 (62.2)

107 (37.8)

283 (56.9)

1

 

 Paediatrician

97 (45.3)

117 (54.7)

214 (43.1)

1.41 (0.84–2.36)

0.19

Frequency of allophone consultations

  ≥ 1x/year < 1 mo.

95 (69.9)

41 (30.2)

136 (27.3)

1

 

  ≥ 1x/mo. < 1/week

101 (53.4)

88 (46.6)

189 (37.6)

2.12 (1.14–3.97)

0.02

  ≥ 1x/week

78 (45.1)

95 (54.9)

173 (34.7)

2.99 (1.60–5.60)

0.001

Sex

 Male

130 (57.5)

96 (42.5)

226 (47.9)

1

 

 Female

134 (54.5)

112 (45.5)

246 (52.1)

1.04 (0.63–1.72)

0.87

Location

 City

117 (53.2)

103 (46.8)

200 (46.0)

1

 

 Peri-urban

83 (59.7)

56 (40.3)

139 (29.1)

0.59 (0.32–1.06)

0.08

 Rural

68 (57.1)

51 (42.9)

119 (24.9)

1.04 (0.57–1.90)

0.89

Source of Finance known

 No

183 (64.0)

130 (36.0)

286 (81.0)

1

 

 Yes

12 (17.9)

55 (82.1)

67 (18.98)

6.62 (3.23–13.58)

< 0.001