From: Prioritization approaches in the development of health practice guidelines: a systematic review
Paper | Number | Involvement method | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Battista, 1995 [12] | Not reported | Not reported | • Members of guideline developing organizations • Potential end users • Patient representatives • Public |
Field, 1995 [13] | Not reported | Delphi or Delphi-like techniques | • Experts • Potential end users (clinicians or patient representatives) |
McClarey, 1999 [14] | Not reported | Not reported | • Professional guideline groups • Health care professionals • Patient representatives |
Oxman, 2006 [15] | Not reported | Delphi technique | • Experts • Potential end users • Public • Others |
Ketola, 2007 [16] | Not reported | Not reported | • Specialist society • Board members of guideline developing organization |
Reveiz, 2010 [17] | > 12 | Workshop, consensus meeting | • Experts • External guideline developers • Methodologist • End users |
Atkins, 2012 [18] | Not reported | Not reported | • Clinicians • Professional organizations • Policymakers • Payers (e.g., health plans) • Government bodies • Quality organizations • Patient representatives |
Schünemann, 2014 [8] | Not Reported | Not reported | • Clinicians • Professional societies • Policymakers • Payers • Public |
Reddy, 2014 [19] | Not Reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Mounesan, 2016 [20] | Range (5–15) | Face-to-face meeting | • Experienced family physicians • Management representatives |