Skip to main content

Table 5 Random effects results predicting program components scores among facilities, MLE facility surveys from Kaduna and Ilorin, Nigeria

From: Assessing the sustainability of the Nigerian urban reproductive health initiative facility-level programming: longitudinal analysis of service quality

 

Training

Outreach

IEC materials

Method provision

Stock-out in last 30 days

 

Marginal

95% CI

Marginal

95% CI

Marginal

95% CI

Marginal

95% CI

Marginal

95% CI

Ilorin (ref: Kaduna)

−0.02

− 0.09; 0.05

0.49

0.07; 0.91*

0.07

−0.50; 0.64

1.25

0.77; 1.72***

0.38

−0.09; 0.85

Survey wave

          

Baseline – 2011 (ref)

 

 

 

 

 

Endline – 2014

0.09

0.02; 0.15**

0.52

0.12; 0.92*

1.48

0.94; 2.02***

0.59

0.16; 1.02**

−0.35

−0.80; 0.09

Sustainability – 2017

0.20

0.14; 0.26***

0.54

0.15; 0.94**

1.26

0.73; 1.80***

2.09

1.66; 2.52***

0.51

0.07; 0.94*

NURHI- supported facility (ref: not NURHI)

0.03

−0.05; 0.11

0.40

−0.10; 0.90

1.67

0.99; 2.35***

1.37

0.81; 1.93***

−0.22

−0.78; 0.33

Private facility (ref: public)

−0.06

−0.11; − 0.01*

−1.48

−1.79; −1.17***

−1.17

−1.59; 0.75***

−0.45

− 0.82; − 0.07*

−0.14

− 0.48; 0.21

Ilorin and Endline (2014) interaction

0.12

0.03; 0.21**

−0.49

−1.06; 0.07

−1.26

−2.02; − 0.49***

−0.71

−1.32; − 0.11*

−0.30

− 0.93; 0.32

Ilorin and sustainability (2017) interaction

−0.20

− 0.29; − 0.11***

−0.50

− 1.06; 0.07

−0.46

−1.22; 0.30

− 1.66

−2.27; − 1.06***

−0.53

−1.15; 0.10

NURHI facility and sustainability (2017) interaction

0.05

−0.05; 0.15

−0.18

− 0.81; 0.45

−0.07

− 0.92; 0.78

−0.88

−1.56; − 0.20*

−0.44

− 1.13; 0.26

Sigma mu

0.09

0.06; 0.12***

0.47

0.30; 0.72***

0.69

0.47; 1.00***

0.75

0.57; 0.97***

0.55

0.37; 0.82***

Sigma epsilon

0.20

0.19; 0.22***

1.27

1.18; 1.38***

1.71

1.59; 1.86***

1.36

1.26; 1.48***

1.41

1.30; 1.52***

Number of observations

474

474

474

474

474

Number of unique facilities

172

172

172

172

172

  1. Note: each outcome created based on PCA of component parts, except for training which is just the average number of providers trained. *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001