Peer Review reports
From: Recognising and responding to deteriorating patients: what difference do national standards make?
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Apr 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 May 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arvid Steinar Haugen |
25 May 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magnolia Cardona |
6 Jun 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Anstey |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Jun 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Jun 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Anstey |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Jun 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Jul 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Anstey |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Jul 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Jul 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthew Anstey |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jul 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
11 Jul 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Sep 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12913-019-4339-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.