Open Peer Review Reports for: Utilization and outcomes of cervical cancer screening services in Harare City, 2012–2016: a secondary data analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sep 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Huchko |
| 29 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michelle Silver |
| 16 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alejandra Castanon |
| 14 Mar 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Christine Gabaza |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Mar 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 May 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Christine Gabaza |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 May 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 May 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Huchko |
| 24 Jun 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Christine Gabaza |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Jun 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Jul 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Jul 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12913-019-4314-8 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
