Skip to main content

Table 5 Patient and provider participant agreement on the usability, readability and content in the evaluated oncofertility decision support resources

From: An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers

Decision Support Resources

Length of the resource

(Just right)

Information easy to read

(Strongly) Agreeb

Information flows in a logical order

(Strongly) Agree

Presentation of the fertility options is balanced

(Strongly) Agree

Enough information to decide on a fertility option

(Strongly) Agree

Resource is easy to use

(Strongly) Agree

Training is needed for patients before using this resource

(Strongly) Agree

Training is needed for health care providers before using this resource

(Strongly) Agree

Resource would have been useful if it used

(Strongly) Agree

Australian Decision Aid (n = 5)

1/5

4/5

5/5

4/5

3/5

4/5

2/4a

3/4a

4/5

Netherlands Decision Aid (n = 7)

1/7

5/7

6/7

5/7a

4/7a

5/7

2/7

3/7

6/7

Sunnybrook Option Grid (n = 4)

3/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

2/4

4/4

1/4

0/3a

4/4

LIVESTRONG Booklet (n = 4)

3/4

4/4

4/4

3/4

1/4

4/4

0/4

2/4

4/4

LIVESTRONG FB† Option Tool (n = 4)

0/4

4/4

3/4a

2/4

0/4a

4/4

1/4

2/4

2/4

MyOncofertility (now SaveMyFertility) (n = 3)

2/3

2/3

3/3

3/3

2/3

3/3

0/3

0/3

2/3

  1. Abbreviations: FB family-building
  2. aOne participant was not sure how useful this section of the decision support resource would be for fertility decision-making, did not answer the question, or rated it as “neither agree nor disagree” in the Likert scale
  3. b(Strongly) Agree includes participants who answered ‘agree’ and ‘strongly agree’