Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)

From: Interventions to develop collectivistic leadership in healthcare settings: a systematic review

Author, Year

Clear objective

Data relevant to addressing objectives

Qualitative data sources relevant to objectives

Qualitative data analysis relevant to objectives

Consideration given to how findings relate to context

Consideration given to how findings relate to researchers’ influence

Sampling strategy relevant to address quantitative research question

Sample representative of population

Quantitative measure appropriate

Acceptable response ratea

Mixed methods design relevant to objective

Integration of qualitative and quantitative relevant to objective

Limitations of integrating findings considered

Outcomes of checklist (Yes/Can’t tell/No)

Dewar & Cook, 2014 [50]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

10/2/1

Rosengren et al., 2010 [53]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

10/2/1

MacPhail et al., 2015 [51]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

8/4/1

Boak et al., 2015 [47]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

No

7/5/1

Gibb et al., 2016 [52]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

No

7/5/1

Van Zwanenberg, 2009 [49]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

No

6/6/1

Miller et al., 2007 [48]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

No

No

6/5/2

Buckley et al. 2009 [37]

Yes

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

No

No

2/9/2

  1. a60% or above