Skip to main content

Table 5 Changes over time in 8 countries where two country situational analyses were done

From: Promoting quality use of medicines in South-East Asia: reports from country situational analyses

Country (Years of country situational analyses)

% URTI cases treated with antibioticsa

% patients treated with antibioticsa

% medicines prescribed from the EMLa

% medicines prescribed by generic namea

% patients prescribed multivitaminsa

% of patients prescribed injectionsa

Average % better (+) medicines use over time (95% CI)

Change in the number of policies implemented between the second and first situation analyses

Direction of better medicines use: More (+); Less (−)

Less (−)

Less (−)

More (+)

More (+)

Less (−)

Less (−)

Sign (+/−) changed for QUM indicators where less use is better use so that “+” = better QUM

Bangladesh (2010, 2014)

 

−16.6

     

0

Bhutan (2011, 2015)

−19.6

+ 8.1

+ 1.5

+ 2.9

− 10.1

−3.7

+ 4.9 (−2.4 to + 12.5)

+ 2

Maldives (2011, 2014)

− 19.3

−13.8

 

+ 19.3

+ 22.8

+ 5.6

+ 4.8 (− 10.0 to + 19.6)

+ 3

Myanmar (2011, 2014)

+ 2.0

+ 7.1

−7.6

+ 11.3

+ 13.7

+ 4.0

− 3.8 (− 10.6 to + 2.9)

+ 4

Nepal (2011, 2014)

− 6.3

−2.5

−0.04

−10.5

+ 11.7

−3.7

− 1.6 (− 7.8 to + 4.5)

0

Sri Lanka (2010, 2015)

 

+ 7.1

− 7.5

+ 13.4

−7.8

 

+ 1.7 (− 6.8 to + 10.1)

+ 2

Thailand (2012, 2015)

−13.7

− 17.9

+ 8.4

+ 5.0

− 2.5

+ 1.3

+ 7.7 (+ 2.0 to + 13.4)**

+ 7

Timor-Leste (2012, 2015)

−24.1

−13.7

−3.7

−6.4

− 17.9

+ 0.1

+ 7.6 (− 2.5 to + 17.7)

−1

  1. aThe mean difference between the second and first situational analyses
  2. **p ≤ 0.05