Building a patient-centered and interprofessional training program with patients, students and care professionals: study protocol of a participatory design and evaluation study

Table 2 Measurement instruments of the effect evaluation

Patients
Domain	Disease knowledge (kp 2)	Attitude towards patient-centeredness (kp 2)	Health literacy (kp 2)	Self-efficacy in patient-provider relations (kp 2)	Self-efficacy towards chronic diseases (kp 2)	Patient activation (kp 3)
Measurement instrument, Cronbach’s alpha and number of items.	Disease-specific instruments	PPOS [36,37,38] (α = 0.75 to 0.88) 18 items	HLS-EU-Q47 [39] Domains in healthcare, each 4 items, 16 items in total: Access information (α = 0.68) Understand information (α = 0.73) Appraise information (α = 0.76) Apply information (α = 0.69)	PEPPI-5 [40, 41] (α = 0.92) 5 items	Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale [42, 43] (α = 0.77–0.92) 20 items	PAM-13 [44] (α = 0.91) 13 items
Students
Domain	Attitude towards patient-centeredness (kp 2)	Trust in patients (kp 2)	Attitude towards other healthcare professions (starting from second cycle, kp 2)	Team skills (starting from second cycle, kp 2)
Measurement instrument, Cronbach’s alpha and number of items.	PPOS [36,37,38] (α = 0.75 to 0.88) 18 items	Thom, 2011 [45] (α = 0.93) 18 items	IAQ [46, 47] 27-items (in case of 2 professions)	Team Skills Scale [48, 49] (α = 0.95) 17 items
Care professionals
Domain	Attitude towards patient-centeredness (kp 2)	Trust in patients (kp 2)
Measurement instrument, Cronbach’s alpha and number of items.	PPOS [36,37,38] (α = 0.75 to 0.88) 18 items	Thom, 2011 [45] (α = 0.93) 18 items

Legend: Table of outcome measures which are used to evaluate the effects of the program. Rows 2, 5 and 8 show the domains of the effect evaluation and the Kirkpatrick level of the domain (kp) per participating group. Rows 3, 6 and 9 show the applied measurement instruments per domain, the Cronbach’s alpha of the measurement instruments and the number of items used in each instrument

ISSN: 1472-6963