Skip to main content

Table 5 Effects of new distribution arrangements on received rates

From: Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements

Variable

Urban

Rural

β

p

95%CI

β

p

95%CI

lower

upper

lower

upper

Medicine-tied model

 Intervention (vs control)

9.66

0.05

0.14

19.19

−13.10

0.00

−18.34

−7.86

 Time (pre-post)

−7.08

0.01

−12.02

−2.13

2.93

0.02

0.42

5.43

 Intervention*Time

6.40

0.09

−1.06

13.86

−7.89

0.00

−11.36

−4.43

Recipient-tied model

 Intervention (vs control)

−9.17

0.03

−17.50

−0.84

 Time (pre-post)

1.83

0.30

−1.63

5.29

 Intervention*Time

−19.65

0.00

−24.67

−14.63

Recipient-medicine-tied model

 Intervention (vs control)

−3.68

0.42

−12.57

5.22

 Time (pre-post)

−0.26

0.91

−4.93

4.41

 Intervention*Time

3.37

0.32

−3.31

10.05

  1. Note: other variables in the models were not shown in the Table; Bold indicates effect size with statistical significance