From: Criteria for prioritization of HIV programs in Viet Nam: a discrete choice experiment
Social & professional variables | Measurement | Value range | Frequency | Median | Mean | std.dev. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Binary | Male = 0 Female = 1 | 38 (55%) 31 (45%) | 0 | 0.45 | 0.50 |
Age group | Ordinal | “26–30” = 2 “31–40” = 3 “41–50” = 4 “51–60” = 5 “>60” = 6 | 3 (4%) 13 (19%) 30 (43%) 22 (32%) 1 (1%) | 4 | 4.07 | 0.86 |
Country of origin | Nominal | Viet Nam = 1 Elsewhere = 0 | 53 (77%) 16 (23%) | |||
Area of work: Program | Binary | No = 0 Yes = 1 | 23 (33%) 46 (67%) | 1 | 0.67 | 0.47 |
Area of work: Policy | Binary | No = 0 Yes = 1 | 41 (59%) 28 (41%) | 0 | 0.41 | 0.49 |
Area of work: Management | Binary | No = 0 Yes = 1 | 29 (42%) 40 (58%) | 1 | 0.58 | 0.49 |
Area of work: Monitoring & Evaluation | Binary | No = 0 Yes = 1 | 31 (45%) 38 (55%) | 1 | 0.55 | 0.50 |
Years of work experience in HIV field | Scale | From 3 to 30 years | – | 14 | 14.6 | 6.19 |
Involved in decision-making | Binary | No = 0 Yes = 1 | 6 (9%) 63 (91%) | 1 | 0.91 | 0.28 |
Responsible for decision-making | Binary | No = 0 Yes = 1 | 24 (35%) 45 (65%) | 1 | 0.65 | 0.48 |