Table 2 Intended (and actual) methodologies employed by Formal Government evaluations over the course of the NMHS
First Plan | Second Plan | COAG Plan | |
|---|---|---|---|
Intended Aim | O; I-Focus on reform approach rather than outcomes N- Appropriateness of initiatives (normative stance) | O; I; R- Focus on reform approach as well as outcomes N- Appropriateness of initiatives (normative stance) | O- Focus on outcomes R- Performance against 12 population indicators |
Actual Focus | O-Approach R- Problem improvement TG- Consumer perspectives | O; I- Approach R- Problem improvement TG- Consumer perspectives | O- Realisation of original objectives R- Problem improvement |
Data Sources | • Repurposing of available national datasets • In-depth case studies • National stakeholder survey and consultations • International expert commentary | • Repurposing of available national datasets • National stakeholder survey and consultations • International expert commentary • Review of mental health by Mental Health Reference Group | • Repurposing of existing and new national datasets to report on 12 population indicators • Jurisdictional data (budget allocations and funding commitments) |