Skip to main content

Table 4 Pharmacy and PMV providers’ prevalence of restriction of clients’ access to contraceptive methods by restriction, method, and family planning training experience, Nigeria 2010

From: Contraceptive service provider imposed restrictions to contraceptive access in urban Nigeria

 

Pharmacist

PMV

Any FP Training

No FP Training

Any FP Training

No FP Training

Minimum age

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

 Male condom

172

79.7

238

74.0

213

75.6*

261

66.7

 Pill

148

89.2***

170

75.3

153

85.0*

160

75.0

 EC

127

89.8**

165

77.6

89

82.0*

94

69.2

 Injectable

130

88.5

159

80.5

na

na

na

na

Minimum parity

 Male condom

172

2.9

238

2.9

213

7.5

261

4.2

 Pill

148

29.1

170

28.8

153

42.5

160

44.4

 EC

127

11.8

165

12.7

89

25.8

94

14.9

 Injectable

130

22.3

159

21.4

na

na

na

na

Marital status

 Male condom

172

7.6

238

10.9

213

6.6

261

7.7

 Pill

148

43.9

170

39.4

153

61.4

160

53.8

 EC

127

24.4

165

27.9

89

31.5*

94

16.0

 Injectable

130

41.5

159

48.4

na

na

na

na

Bias score

 Male condom

172

0.9

238

0.9

213

0.9*

261

0.8

 Pill

148

1.6

170

1.4

153

1.9

160

1.7

 EC

127

1.3

165

1.2

89

1.4**

94

1.0

 Injectable

130

1.5

159

1.5

na

na

na

na

 Totala

 

3.8

 

3.5

 

4.2

 

3.5

  1. na Provider doesn’t have jurisdiction to provide method
  2. *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; Chi Square, Fisher’s Exact, and t-tests of the association between bias and any family planning training experience
  3. anot including injectable