Skip to main content

Table 3 Health facility family planning providers’ prevalence of restriction of clients’ access to contraceptive methods among Nurses/Midwives and CHEWs by restriction, method, and experience of in-service family planning training experience, Nigeria 2010

From: Contraceptive service provider imposed restrictions to contraceptive access in urban Nigeria

 

Nurse/Midwife

CHEW

Any In-service FP Training

No In-service FP Training

Any In-service FP Training

No In-service FP Training

Minimum age

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

 Male condom

245

80.0

176

75.6

122

65.6

102

63.7

 Pill

276

91.3*

246

85.8

145

89.7**

181

77.9

 EC

156

72.4

104

64.4

44

77.3

48

70.8

 Injectable

307

91.2*

320

86.3

155

92.9*

222

84.2

 IUD

223

92.8

126

96.0

96

92.7

67

91.0

Minimum parity

 Male condom

245

3.7

176

3.4

122

1.6

102

2.9

 Pill

276

33.3

246

39.4

145

29.7***

181

50.8

 EC

156

10.3

104

13.5

44

13.6

48

20.8

 Injectable

307

57.3**

320

67.5

155

65.2

222

72.5

 IUD

223

48.4

126

58.7

96

51.0

67

64.2

Marital status

 Male condom

245

7.8

176

10.2

122

10.7

102

15.7

 Pill

276

40.6***

246

56.5

145

39.3***

181

71.8

 EC

156

14.1

104

16.4

44

15.9

48

22.9

 Injecable

307

65.2***

320

78.1

155

67.7***

222

85.1

 IUD

223

59.2***

126

81.0

96

61.5**

67

80.6

Bias score

 Male condom

245

0.9

176

0.9

122

0.8

102

0.8

 Pill

276

1.7*

246

1.8

145

1.6***

181

2.0

 EC

156

1.0

104

0.9

44

1.1

48

1.1

 Injectable

307

2.1*

320

2.3

155

2.3

222

2.4

 IUD

223

2.0***

126

2.4

96

2.1*

67

2.4

 Total

 

7.7

 

8.3

 

7.9

 

8.7

  1. *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; Chi Square, Fisher’s Exact, and Anova tests of the association between bias and experience of training