Intervention, Study | Outcome | Measurement instrument | Effectiveness results as measured by measurement instrument (baseline; follow-up) |
---|---|---|---|
Proprietary status, Davis 1993 [41] | Composite measure of poor quality based on rates of decubitus ulcers, catheterization, physical restraints, chemical restraints, and drug error rates. | Composite index Higher scores indicate poorer quality | Mean (SD) For-profit: 0.34 (2.30) Not-for-profit: −0.57 (1.87) |
Person-centred environment (PCE), Chenoweth 2014 [40] | Agitation | Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Higher score indicates greater agitation | Mean (95% CI) Control: 52 (43–61); 51 (41–62) PCE: 65 (57–73); 55 (46–64); p = 0.04 |
Quality of life | DemQol-proxy Higher score indicates improved quality of life | Mean (95% CI) Control: 101 (98–104); 103 (99–106) PCE: 101 (99–104); 106 (103–109); p = 0.02 | |
Social interactions and behaviour | Care interaction quality (QUIS) % interactions positive | Mean (95% CI) Control: 78 (73–83); 82 (76–88) PCE: 78 (74–83); 82 (76–87); p = 0.55 | |
Emotional responses in care (ERIC) % positive | Mean (95% CI) Control: 25 (20–30); 25 (18–31) PCE: 23 (18–28); 26 (21–32); p = 0.63 | ||
Special care unit (SCU), Swanson 1993 [42] Swanson 1994 [43] | Cognitive status | Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) Cognitive dimension, higher scores indicate lower cognitive ability | Mean (SD) Traditional: 45.38 (15.64); 52.88 (17.89) SCU: 56.67 (12.94); 59.69 (12.95) |
Social interactions and behaviour | Individual Incident Reports (IIR) Number of catastrophic reactions | Mean (SD) Traditional: 82; 46 SCU: 156; 48 | |
Function | Functional Abilities Checklist (FAC) Higher score indicates greater function | Mean (SD) Traditional: 73.67 (15.41); 71.63 (12.25) SCU: 76.15 (12.35); 76.23 (9.76) | |
Geriatric Rating Scale (GRS) Higher score indicates reduced function | Mean (SD) Traditional: 30.89 (8.18); 35.13 (10.22) SCU: 32.69 (7.76); 35.39 (7.38) |