Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression model to predict the EBP behavior scores over time based on their friendship patterns in the subgroup who sought information from highly engaged central staff

From: Implementation of evidence-informed practice through central network actors; a case study of three public health units in Canada

  

Regression coefficients

Respondents

Friends with someone who is:

 

Baseline

 Not highly engaged

Not highly engaged

9.9(1.2)

Highly engaged, but not central

−3.5(2.1)

Highly engaged central

−0.8(1.7)

 Highly engaged, but not central

Not highly engaged

0.1(3.4)

Highly engaged, but not central

−3.3(2.4)

Highly engaged central

−1.8(2.7)

 Highly engaged central

Not highly engaged

6.1(3.2)

Highly engaged, but not central

0.4(4.3)

Highly engaged central

5.6(2.4)*

Change from baseline

 Not highly engaged

Not highly engaged

−0.7(1.1)

Highly engaged, but not central

2.3(1.8)

Highly engaged central

3.3(1.4)*

 Highly engaged, but not central

Not highly engaged

−2.0(3.2)

Highly engaged, but not central

2.6(2.3)

Highly engaged central

5.7(2.3)*

 Highly engaged central

Not highly engaged

8.1(3.2)*

Highly engaged, but not central

3.0(3.8)

Highly engaged central

4.8(2.0)*

Random effects variance

 Health Units

0.6(1.5)

 Individuals

29.2(5.4)

 Residual

21.8(3.0)

  1. 1: The coefficients for all levels at baseline represent the difference from the first row
  2. 2: The coefficients for all levels at ‘change from the baseline’ represent the difference from their baseline
  3. *:p < 0.05