Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A cohort study of ethnic differences in use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for breast cancer in New Zealand

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Culakova
12 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Maishman
7 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Sanjeewa Seneviratne
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Maishman
25 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Culakova
29 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Sanjeewa Seneviratne
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Maishman
14 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Culakova
30 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Sanjeewa Seneviratne
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sanjeewa Seneviratne
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2027-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement