Table 3 Crude and adjusted logistic regression for use of dental service in the public sector. São Paulo, 2003 and 2008
From: Socioeconomic inequalities in dental health services in Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2003–2008
Dental health service use in the public sector-2003 | Dental health service use in the public sector-2008 | Difference in association of socioeconomic factor and dental service use between 2003 and 2008a | Dental health service use from public sector- 2003 and 2008b | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dental service use from public sector % (n) | Crude OR (95% CI) | Adjusted ORc (95% CI) | Dental service use from public sector % (n) | Crude OR (95% CI) | Adjusted ORc (95% CI) | Crude Model- p-value | Adjusted Model- p-value | p-value | |
Education | 0.098 | 0.075 | |||||||
0–3 | 19.0 (21) | 1 | 1 | 14.9 (20) | 1 | 1 | 0.048 | ||
4–7 | 9.9 (18) | 0.5 (0.2–0.9) | 0.5 (0.2–0.9) | 15.00 (31) | 1.0 (0.5–2.1) | 1.1 (0.5–2.2) | 0.865 | ||
8–11 | 6.2 (13) | 0.3 (0.1–0.8) | 0.3 (0.1–0.9) | 6.9 (36) | 0.4 (0.2–0.8) | 0.4 (0.2–0.8) | 0.201 | ||
12+ | 0.5 (2) | 0.02 (0.01–0.1) | 0.02 (0.01–0.2) | 2.0 (4) | 0.1 (0.04–0.4) | 0.1 (0.04–0.8) | 0.248 | ||
Household incomed | 0.084 | 0.069 | |||||||
≤1 | 10.5 (9) | 1 | 1 | 14.5 (21) | 1 | 1 | 0.255 | ||
>1 to 2.5 | 16.2 (15) | 1.7 (0.5–5.2) | 1.9 (0.6–5.9) | 8.3 (26) | 0.5 (0.2–1.2) | 0.5 (0.2–1.3) | 0.121 | ||
≥2.5 to 6 | 8.0 (25) | 0.7 (0.2–2.9) | 0.8 (0.2–3.2) | 2.6 (8) | 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.002 | ||
≥6 | 1.4 (5) | 0.1 (0.02–0.6) | 0.1 (0.03–0.7) | 2.4 (7) | 0.1 (0.02–0.4) | 0.1 (0.02–0.4) | 0.804 | ||
Housing condition | 0.142 | 0.067 | |||||||
Adequate | 5.4 (45) | 1 | 1 | 6.3 (79) | 1 | 1 | 0.668 | ||
Inadequate | 8.8 (9) | 1.7 (0.5–5.8) | 1.9 (0.5–6.5) | 11.6 (12) | 1.9 (0.9–4.2) | 1.9 (0.9–4.3) | 0.157 | ||
Ethnicity | 0.800 | 0.426 | |||||||
Caucasian | 5.2 (32) | 1 | 1 | 4.7 (44) | 1 | 1 | 0.995 | ||
Non-Caucasian | 7.5 (22) | 1.5 (0.6–3.3) | 1.7 (0.8–3.7) | 11.4 (47) | 2.6 (1.4–4.8) | 2.9 (1.6–5.2) | 0.701 | ||