Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of characteristics of included studies (n = 55)

From: Methods used to address fidelity of receipt in health intervention research: a citation analysis and systematic review

Study characteristic

n (%)

n (%)

Design*

 RCT

16 (29.1)

Quasi-experimental

3 (5.5)

 Cluster RCT

12 (38.2)

Case study

1 (1.8)

 Pilot/feasibility

15 (27.3)

Controlled

1 (1.8)

 Pre-post design

2 (3.6)

Unclear

5 (9.1)

Intervention recipients

 People with health conditions

17 (30.9)

Employees/workers

5 (9.1)

 Family/informal carers

6 (10.9)

Care home staff and residents

2 (3.6)

 Children/Adolescents

9 (16.4)

Ethnic minority women

1 (1.8)

 Healthcare staff

9 (16.4)

Smokers (adults and adolescents)

2 (3.6)

 Restaurant customers

1 (1.8)

Families

2 (3.6)

 People in weight management classes

1 (1.8)

  

Intervention deliverers

 Nurses

10 (18.2)

Counsellor/psychologist

2 (3.6)

 Allied Health Care professional

7 (12.7)

Academics

2 (3.6)

 Organisations (NHS/research council)

2 (3.6)

Teachers

1 (1.8)

 Healthcare staff

5 (9.1)

Teachers and Peers

1 (1.8)

 Social worker

1 (1.8)

Music therapist

1 (1.8)

 Multi-disciplinary team

1 (1.8)

Specialist Trainers

1 (1.8)

 Peers

2 (3.6)

Health educators

1 (1.8)

 Exercise trainer/physiologist

2 (2.6)

Graduate nurses OR social workers

1 (1.8)

 Intervention programme staff

1 (1.8)

Health educator + teacher

1 (1.8)

 Team leaders

1 (1.8)

Unclear

12 (21.8)

Level of delivery

 Individual

25 (45.5)

Group

19 (35.1)

 Both individual and group

3 (5.5)

Unclear

8 (14.5)

Mode of delivery

 Face to face only

28 (69.1)

Telephone

1 (1.8)

 Online (Internet)

2 (3.6)

Telehealth

1 (1.8)

 Text messaging

1 (1.8)

Unclear/missing

5 (9.1)

 Mixture

7 (12.7)

  
  1. Note: *The design is of the study the fidelity assessment is part of, and not the design used to address fidelity