Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic Regression Estimates and 95% CIs for Stunting, Wasting, and Complementary Feeding for Children 6–8 months

From: The potential effectiveness of the nutrition improvement program on infant and young child feeding and nutritional status in the Northwest and Southwest regions of Cameroon, Central Africa

 

B (CI)

SE

p

Exp (B)

Unadjusted

Wastinga

−0.20 [−1.36, .98]

0.59

0.68

0.82 [0.30, 2.21]

Stuntingb

1.89 [1.49, 2.38]**

0.23

0.00

6.62 [4.30, 10.18]

Complementary Feedingc

0.07 [−0.27, .42]

0.17

0.64

1.08 [0.75, 1.53]

Adjusted

Wastinga

0.26 [−1.57, 2.56]

1.02

0.79

1.30 [0.37, 4.65]

Stuntingb

1.71 [1.23, 2.32]**

0.28

0.00

5.52 [3.37, 9.02]

Complementary Feedingc

0.09 [−0.36, 0.57]

0.22

0.65

1.09 [0.72, 1.66]

  1. Adjusted for occupation, religion, number of months planning to breastfeed, attended IWC elsewhere, Biological Mother or Father, urban location, economic status
  2. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, SE standard error
  3. ** p < 0.001
  4. aBase for wasting is student, Christian, Biological Mother, Rural location, NIP, attended IWC elsewhere
  5. bBase for stunting is health worker, Christian, Biological Mother, Urban location, NIP, did not attend IWC elsewhere
  6. cBase for complementary feeding is student, Christian, Biological Mother, Rural location, non-NIP, attended IWC elsewhere