Survey Items | Institution-level | Individual-level | T T = (Mean1–Mean2) | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean 1 (SD) | Positive response (%) | Mean 2 (SD) | Positive response (%) | |||
Necessity | 3.94 (1.024) | 82.14 | 3.81 (1.039) | 76.95 | 0.13 | 0.229 |
Public reporting is necessary | 3.89 (1.152) | 78.57 | 3.69 (1.157) | 71.75 | 0.19 | 0.096 |
Third-party reporting is necessary | 3.98 (1.057) | 81.49 | 3.92 (1.072) | 79.22 | 0.06 | 0.566 |
Methodological rigor | 3.35 (0.774) | 68.18 | 3.34 (0.783) | 65.91 | 0.01 | 0.387* |
Patients cannot interpret or recognize data complexity | 3.10 (1.127) | 49.03 | 2.99 (1.146) | 46.43 | 0.11 | 0.428 |
Public reporting data is unreliable | 3.72 (1.103) | 73.53 | 3.73 (1.098) | 73.70 | −0.01 | 0.959 |
Lack of appropriately prescribed medicine metrics | 3.64 (1.047) | 69.48 | 3.66 (1.050) | 70.45 | −0.02 | 0.846 |
No adequate risk adjustment | 2.86 (1.172) | 41.50 | 2.86 (1.237) | 41.88 | −0.01 | 0.959 |
No adequate amount of prescriptions for statistical comparison | 3.23 (1.174) | 56.49 | 3.23 (1.209) | 55.84 | −0.01 | 0.977 |
Lack of transparency of methodology | 3.58 (1.083) | 69.81 | 3.56 (1.078) | 69.16 | 0.02 | 0.856 |
Impact | 3.66 (0.622) | 83.12 | 3.66 (0.636) | 81.49 | 0 | 0.881* |
Improved prescription quality | 3.82 (1.032) | 77.92 | 3.86 (1.032) | 78.90 | −0.04 | 0.716 |
GPs learn more knowledge on the rational prescription of medicines | 4.05 (1.008) | 84.09 | 4.12 (0.952) | 86.27 | −0.07 | 0.636 |
Provide a sense of achievement to GPs | 3.31 (1.100) | 56.82 | 3.31 (1.093) | 57.47 | 0.01 | 0.994 |
Refuse high-risk patients | 3.5 (1.04) | 68.63 | 3.5 (1.031) | 68.51 | 0 | 0.995 |
Improve numbers and not quality | 3.49 (1.074) | 68.83 | 3.5 (1.080) | 68.83 | −0.01 | 0.92 |
Penalize low performing GPs | 3.76 (1.010) | 78.90 | 3.74 (1.015) | 77.92 | 0.02 | 0.832 |
Loss of volume of patients | 3.75 (0.873) | 78.57 | 3.70 (0.951) | 75.97 | 0.05 | 0.800 |
Increase medical disputes | 3.59 (1.088) | 70.13 | 3.57 (1.090) | 69.16 | 0.02 | 0.854 |