Skip to main content

Table 3 Tobit regression analysis of potential contextual factors influencing the input slacks produced by the baseline DEA model

From: Technical efficiency of women’s health prevention programs in Bucaramanga, Colombia: a four-stage analysis

 

ANC Program

EDCC Program

FP Program

 

Staff Slacks

Capital Slacks

Recurring Goods Slacks

Staff Slacks

Capital Slacks

Recurring Goods Slacks

Staff Slacks

Capital Slacks

Recurring Goods Slacks

Context variable

Coef

95 % CI

Coef

95 % CI

Coef

95 % CI

Coef

95 % CI

Coef

95 % CI

Coef

95 % CI

Coef

95 % CI

Coef

95 % CI

Coef

95 % CI

Agea

1.85

−10.2

13.9

3.50

−14.9

21.9

1.39

−10.9

13.7

0.73

−18.8

20.26

0.50

−3.02

4.02

1.24

−4.46

6.94

4.49

−8.57

17.55

9.25

−10.4

28.9

4.49

−8.57

17.55

Educationb

280.5

−342.8

903.9

633.9

−331.8

1599.

389.9

−265

1045

−399.6

−1455

656.4

−22.8

−143

97.5

−1.48

−174

171

−331.1

−1070

408.6

−580

−1683

523

−331

−1070

408

Povertyc

−4.48

−426.9

417.9

77.72

−565.3

720.7

25.65

−413

464

−282.7

−1077

512.2

−33.2

−116

49.94

−33.9

−146

78.5

101.5

−431.4

634.6

204

−586

995

101.5

−431

634

Stable

Uniond

         

−197.1

−606.9

212.7

−10.3

−49.2

28.56

2.24

−53.5

57.9

         

Constant

−182

−781

415

−409

−1281

461

−222

−800

355

349.9

−808

1508

8.22

−150

166

−33

−278

212

16.7

−735

768

−26.45

−1159

1106

16.76

−735

768

  1. aAge = Women’s average age
  2. bEducation = Proportion of women 18 or older with high school degree
  3. cPoverty = Proportion of population in Unidos program, the Colombian national program to fight poverty which support families with very low incomes
  4. dStable union = Proportion of families with women as family head