UNN, | RMC, video | p-valueb | p-valuec | |
---|---|---|---|---|
standard consultation | conference consultation | |||
How well did you perceive the patient cooperated during the consultation? (254 + 299)d | p = 0.58 | p = 0.75 | ||
Very good | 95 (37) | 105 (35) | ||
Good | 157 (62) | 190 (64) | ||
Neither good nor bad | 2 (1) | 3 (1) | ||
Bad | 0 (0) | 1 (0) | ||
Very bad | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
How well could you evaluate/examine the patient? (243 + 290)d | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | ||
Very good | 98 (40) | 57 (20) | ||
Good | 144 (59) | 225 (78) | ||
Neither good nor bad | 1 (0) | 7 (2) | ||
Bad | 0 (0) | 1 (0) | ||
Very bad | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
How well could you treat the patient? (246 + 292)d | p = 0.068 | p = 0.039 | ||
Very good | 23 (16) | 12 (7) | ||
Good | 119 (83) | 155 (91) | ||
Neither good nor bad | 1 (1) | 2 (1) | ||
Bad | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | ||
Very bad | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | ||
Other (not applicable) | 102 | 122 | ||
How well could you inform the patient? (254 + 298)d | p = 0.106 | p = 0.28 | ||
Very good | 54 (22) | 50 (17) | ||
Good | 191 (77) | 233 (79) | ||
Neither good nor bad | 4 (2) | 12 (4) | ||
Bad | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
Very bad | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
Other (too young) | 5 | 3 | ||
Overall how well could you assess/treat/checking the patient? (254 + 293) d | p = 0.0047 | p = 0.040 | ||
Very good | 56 (22) | 43 (15) | ||
Good | 198 (78) | 242 (83) | ||
Neither good nor bad | 0 (0) | 7 (2) | ||
Bad | 0 (0) | 1 (0) | ||
Very bad | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
Sum score, mean(SD) | 1.72 ± 0.38 | 1.82 ± 0.38 | p = 0.0030 | NA |