Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias table: modified Newcastle Ottowa

From: A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors

 

Author and year

Representativeness of intervention group (selection bias)

Control group

Representativeness of control group (selection bias)

Comparability of intervention and control group

Adequate assessment of outcome

Adequate follow-up

Reporting

Generalizability

Conflicts of interest

1

Lockyer L et al., (2014) [65]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

Low

N/A

Detailed

Good

No

2

Douglas A & McCann I, (1996) [66]

High

High

N/A

N/A

Low

N/A

Adequate

Good

No

3

Beaumont B (1979) [63]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

Low

N/A

Incomplete

Potential

No

4

Eskin F, (1974) [64]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Detailed

Limited

No

5

Baker M et al. (1997) [67]

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Limited

Limited

No

6

Hilton S et al. (1997) [58]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

High

N/A

Detailed

N/A

Yes

7

Freeman et al. (2002)

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Adequate

Limited

No

8

Bellman L (2002) [60]

High

High

N/A

N/A

Low

N/A

Detailed

Limited

Yes

9

Wilkinson D (2001) [61]

Low

N/A

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Adequate

Potential

Yes

10

White CD et al. (2007) [62]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

Low-

N/A

Incomplete

Limited

Yes

11

Gardiner M et al. (2006) [48]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

High-

Unclear

Detailed

Potential

No

12

Straume et al. (2010) [50]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Detailed

Potential

No

13

Straume and Shaw (2010) [49]

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Detailed

Potential

No

14

Felix H et al. (2003) [70]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

Low

N/A

Adequate

Potential

No

15

MacIsaac et al. (2000) [71]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

Low

N/A

Adequate

Potential

Yes-

16

Bregazzi R and Harrison (2005) [38]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Unclear

Poor

Limited

No

17

Kahn TR et al. (2010) [39]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Detailed

Limited

No

18

Crouse BJ and Munson RL (2006) [40]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Unclear

Adequate

Potential

No

19

Robinson M and Slaney GM (2013) [41]

High

High

N/A

N/A

Low 2X Data sets

High

Adequate

Potential

Yes

20

Rabinowitz et al. (2005) [32]

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Adequate

Potential

Yes

21

Mathews M et al. (2008) [33]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low-

Detailed

Potential

Yes

22

Quinn KJ et al. (2011) [34]

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

High

Adequate

Potential

Yes

23

Landry et al. (2011) [35]

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

High

Detailed

Limited

Yes

24

Magnus JH & Tollan A (1993) [36]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

High

Low

Adequate

Potential

Yes

25

Stearns et al. (2000) [37]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Unclear

Limited

Potential

Yes

26

Halaas et al. (2008) [42]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low-

Unclear- ‘

Detailed

Good

Yes

27

Smucny J et al. (2005) [43]

High

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Adequate

Good

Yes

28

Adkins et al. (1987) [44]

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Adequate

Potential

Yes

29

Wearne S et al. (2010) [46]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Detailed

Limited

Yes

30

Charles et al. (2005) [45]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Adequate

Potential

No

31

Morris CG et al. (2008) [47]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Detailed

Potential

No

32

Barclay et al. (1994) [51]

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

High-

Unclear

Poor

Limited

Yes

33

Paul Green (2015) [52]

Unclear

N/A

N/A

N/A

High

Low

Limited

Potential

Unclear

34

Harrison J and Redpath L (2002) [68]

High

High

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Low

Adequate

Potential

No

35

Delacourt L and Savage R (2002) [69]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Low

Adequate

Potential

No

36

Matsumoto M et al. (2008) [21]

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Detailed

Good

No

37

Matsumoto M et al. (2008) [22]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Detailed

Good

No

38

US department of Health and Human services Health resources and services administration

(2012) [23]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

High

Low

Limited

Potential

Yes

39

Pathman D et al. (1992) [24]

Low

Low

Unclear

High

Low

Low

Detailed

Good

Yes

40

Cullen TJ et al. (1997) [25]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low-

Low

Detailed

Good

No

41

New Zealand Ministry of Health (2012) [26]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

High

Unclear

Limited

Potential

No

42

Dunbabin JS et al. (2006) [27]

High –

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Adequate

Potential

Yes

43

Jackson J et al. (2003) [28]

Low

Low

Low

High

Low

Low

Adequate

Limited

NO

44

Mathews M et al. (2013) [29]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Adequate

Good

Yes

45

Navin TR and Nichols AW (1977) [30]

Low

High

N/A

N/A

Low

Low

Detailed

Limited

Yes

46

Pathman et al. (2004) [31]

High

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Adequate

Good

No

47

WONCA (2010) [53]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Unclear

Limited

Limited

No

48

Pena S et al. (2010) [54]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Unclear

Limited

Limited

No

49

Wilson et al. (1998) [55]

Unclear

High

N/A

N/A

High

Unclear

Limited

Limited

No

50

Hutten – Czapski (1998) [56]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

High

Unclear

Limited

Limited

No

51

Anderson M & Rosenberg (1990) [57]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

High

Low

Detailed

Limited

No