Skip to main content

Table 3 Proportions of time allocated to case management functions per month

From: How do case managers spend time on their functions and activities?

 

Mean (range)

SD

F

p

Needs assessment

  

1.256

0.292

 Nursing case managers (n = 42)

14.0 % (3.0 %–30.0 %)

7.1 %

  

 Social worker case managers (n = 36)

12.3 % (0–20.0 %)

6.6 %

  

 Allied health case managers (n = 42)

11.9 % (3.5 %–25.0 %)

5.3 %

  

 Case managers with other professional backgrounds (n = 24)

11.3 % (5.0 %–20.0 %)

4.9 %

  

Total (N = 144)

12.5 % (0–30.0 %)

6.2 %

  

Care planning

  

3.171

0.026

 Nursing case managers (n = 42)

15.3 % (2.0 %–40.0 %)

8.3 %

  

 Social worker case managers (n = 36)

12.1 % (1.0 %–20.0 %)

5.4 %

  

 Allied health case managers (n = 42)

13.4 % (5.0 %–30.0 %)

6.2 %

  

 Case managers with other professional backgrounds (n = 24)

10.6 % (5.0 %–20.0 %)

4.0 %

  

Total (N = 144)

13.2 % (1.0 %–40.0 %)

6.5 %

  

Care plan implementation

  

0.095

0.963

 Nursing case managers (n = 42)

13.8 % (1.0 %–30.0 %)

6.4 %

  

 Social worker case managers (n = 36)

13.8 % (5.0 %–30.0 %)

6.7 %

  

 Allied health case managers (n = 42)

14.2 % (2.5 %–40.0 %)

7.6 %

  

 Case managers with other professional backgrounds (n = 24)

13.3 % (3.0 %–30.0 %)

6.2 %

  

Total (N = 144)

13.8 % (1.0 %–40.0 %)

6.8 %

  

Care coordination

  

0.497

0.685

 Nursing case managers (n = 42)

20.4 % (1.0 %–50.0 %)

13.0 %

  

 Social worker case managers (n = 36)

22.8 % (4.0 %–90.0 %)

17.2 %

  

 Allied health case managers (n = 42)

21.3 % (0–50.0 %)

13.6 %

  

 Case managers with other professional backgrounds (n = 24)

24.6 % (5.0 %–50.0 %)

12.8 %

  

Total (N = 144)

22.0 % (0–90.0 %)

14.2 %

  

Monitoring and review

  

0.398

0.755

 Nursing case managers (n = 42)

15.4 % (5.0 %–30.0 %)

6.8 %

  

 Social worker case managers (n = 36)

16.4 % (0.5 %–50.0 %)

9.7 %

  

 Allied health case managers (n = 42)

17.0 % (4.0 %–40.0 %)

9.6 %

  

 Case managers with other professional backgrounds (n = 24)

17.7 % (10.0 %–50.0 %)

9.3 %

  

Total (N = 144)

16.5 % (0.5 %–50.0 %)

8.8 %

  

Outcome evaluation

  

1.490

0.220

 Nursing case managers (n = 42)

8.8 % (0–20.0 %)

4.0 %

  

 Social worker case managers (n = 36)

7.0 % (0–25.0 %)

5.3 %

  

 Allied health case managers (n = 42)

7.4 % (0–20.0 %)

4.9 %

  

 Case managers with other professional backgrounds (n = 24)

9.0 % (0–20.0 %)

4.7 %

  

Total (N = 144)

8.0 % (0–25.0 %)

4.8 %

  

Other functions (program-related)

  

0.117

0.950

 Nursing case managers (n = 42)

8.2 % (0–50.0 %)

10.1 %

  

 Social worker case managers (n = 36)

9.1 % (0–60.0 %)

14.2 %

  

 Allied health case managers (n = 42)

7.6 % (0–50.0 %)

10.3 %

  

 Case managers with other professional backgrounds (n = 24)

8.2 % (0–55.0 %)

12.4 %

  

Total (N = 144)

8.3 % (0–60.0 %)

11.6 %

  

Other functions (not program-related)

  

0.185

0.907

 Nursing case managers (n = 42)

5.0 % (0–77.0 %)

12.4 %

  

 Social worker case managers (n = 36)

3.9 % (0–15.0 %)

4.6 %

  

 Allied health case managers (n = 42)

5.3 % (0–60.0 %)

10.4 %

  

 Case managers with other professional backgrounds (n = 24)

4.4 % (0–15.0 %)

4.7 %

  

Total (N = 144)

4.7 % (0–77.0 %)

9.2 %

  
  1. Note:1. The sample size was 144 due to missing data. 2. Significance level was set at 0.05