Skip to main content

Table 4 Steps to prediction model for the course of complaints

From: Exploring physiotherapists’ personality traits that may influence treatment outcome in patients with chronic diseases: a cohort study

 

Coef.

S.E.

Z

P

95 % CI

ICC

Model 0

 Intercept

 

−3.66

0.19

  

−4.02 – -3.30

 

 Total Model

       

 Var. Th. level

 

0.47

0.31

  

0.13–1.73

0.076

 Var. Pt. level

 

5.75

0.43

  

4.96–6.66

 

Model I

Patients

 

Gender

−0.47

0.25

−1.88

0.060

−0.96–0.02

 
 

Age

0.01

0.01

1.76

0.079

−0.002–0.03

 

 Intercept

 

−2.90

0.44

  

−3.76 – -2.03

 

 Total Model

       

 Var. Th. level

 

0.41

0.29

  

0.11–1.63

0.067

 Var. Pt. level

 

5.68

0.43

  

4.90–6.58

 

Model II

Patients

 

Gender

−0.48

0.25

−1.94

0.053

−0.97–0.006

 
 

Age

0.01

0.01

1.63

0.103

−0.003–0.03

 

Therapists

      
 

Neuroticism

0.59

0.32

1.81

0.070

−0.048–1.22

 

 Intercept

 

−4.27

0.88

  

−5.99 – -2.56

 

 Total Model

      

 Var. Th. level

0.36

0.26

  

0.09–1.46

0.060

 Var. Pt. level

5.65

0.42

  

4.88–6.54

 

Model III

Patients

 

Gender

−0.43

0.25

−1.66

0.098

−0.92–0.08

 
 

Age

0.01

0.01

1.11

0.269

−0.01–0.03

 

Therapists

      
 

Neuroticism

0.71

0.29

2.47

0.014*

0.15–1.28

 
 

Gender

0.72

0.32

2.21

0.027*

0.08–1.35

 
 

Life events

−0.54

0.32

−1.68

0.092

−1.16–0.09

 

 Intercept

 

−5.42

0.94

  

−7.27 − -3.57

 

 Total Model

       

 Var. Th. level

 

0.12

0.19

  

0.01–2.57

0.021

 Var. Pt. level

 

5.60

0.43

  

4.82–6.52

 
  1. *Significant variables ≤0.05, CI convenience interval, coef. Regression coefficient, ICC Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, P significant level, Pt Patient, R2 percentage of variance explained by model, SE. standard error, Th Therapist, Z z-score