Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratios from logistic regression model explaining home care receipt

From: Who pays for home care? A study of nationally representative data on disabled older Americans

 

Odds ratio

(95 % CI)

Need for caregiving

  

No. of ADL’s

  

 1-2

1.11

(0.96–1.29)

 3-4

1.85**

(1.57–2.17)

 5-6

3.19**

(2.61–3.89)

No. of IADL's

  

 2-3

2.40**

(2.03–2.82)

 4-5

4.27**

(3.56–5.12)

 6-8

6.00**

(4.91–7.33)

Age

1.02**

(1.01–1.03)

Demographics

  

Female

0.95

(0.85–1.07)

Race

  

 African American

0.68**

(0.56–0.83)

 Other

0.80

(0.45–1.41)

Hispanic

1.00

(0.76–1.32)

Economic resources

  

Education

  

 High school grad

1.45**

(1.29–1.64)

 College degree

2.22**

(1.83–2.71)

Family income

  

 15,000–29,999

1.07

(0.92–1.23)

 30,000–49,999

1.06

(0.84–1.34)

 50,000–74,999

1.15

(0.86–1.54)

 75,000+

1.98**

(1.33–2.95)

 Missing

0.93

(0.81–1.06)

Home assets

  

 Yes, but missing

0.65**

(0.56–0.74)

  <150,000

0.62**

(0.54–0.71)

  ≥150,000

0.66**

(0.54–0.80)

Year

  

 1994

1.13

(0.98–1.29)

 1999

0.59**

(0.50–0.69)

 2004

0.36**

(0.31–0.43)

Informal resources

  

Informal care hours

  

 0

4.37**

(3.66–5.21)

 1-8

2.44**

(2.05–2.91)

 9-24

1.35**

(1.12–1.62)

Marital status

  

 Single

1.06

(0.80–1.42)

 Widowed

1.47**

(1.28–1.68)

 Divorced

1.49**

(1.21–1.83)

Number of children

  

 1

0.71**

(0.59–0.85)

 2

0.69**

(0.58–0.81)

 3

0.63**

(0.52–0.76)

 4+

0.61**

(0.51–0.73)

  1. NLTCS, 1989-2004 (N = 11.725). Model includes state fixed effects
  2. *p < .05, **p < .01