Skip to main content

Table 6 Rating of the consistency between available evidence and decisions

From: Uptake of evidence in policy development: the case of user fees for health care in public health facilities in Uganda

   

Public sector

Private sector

 
  

Donors (n = 3)

MoH (n = 6)

MoF (n = 1)

Service providers and managers at district level (n = 6)

CSOs (n = 4)

Researchers (n = 2)

Service provider PNFP (n = 3)

Total

Agenda setting

Strong (1)

 

3

1

 

1

1

 

6

Moderate (2)

 

1

     

1

Weak (3)

3

1

  

3

  

7

No influence (4)

1

   

1

 

2

Analytical stage

Strong (1)

 

2

     

2

Moderate (2)

 

1

  

1

1

 

3

Weak (3)

3

2

  

2

1

 

8

No influence (4)

1

  

1

  

2

Decision making

Strong (1)

 

3

     

3

Moderate (2)

  

1

    

1

Weak (3)

3

1

  

3

2

 

9

No influence (4)

2

  

1

  

3

Implementation

Strong (1)

 

1

     

1

Moderate (2)

 

1

1

3

  

1

6

Weak (3)

3

2

 

1

2

1

2

11

No influence (4)

2

 

2

2

1

 

7

  1. Service providers could only rank at the policy implementation stage.
  2. MoH: two were not able to rank and were excluded from this analysis.
  3. Service providers: three were not able to rank and were excluded from this analysis.