Skip to main content

Table 6 Roles of methods in mixed methods studies in HSR

From: Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study

Role of quantitative

  
 

Proposal (N = 43)

Report (N = 48)

   Test effectiveness

47% (20)

46% (22)

   Describe

40% (17)

54% (26)

   Explain variability

26% (11)

21% (10)

   Determine sample for qualitative

35% (15)

40% (19)

   Generalise the qualitative findings

5% (2)

4% (2)

   Generate consensus

5% (2)

2% (1)

   Psychometrically test

2% (1)

4% (2)

   Provide topic guide for qualitative

2% (1)

4% (2)

Role of qualitative

  

   Develop the research question

0% (0)

0% (0)

   Generate hypothesis

0% (0)

0% (0)

   Establish theoretical framework

2% (1)

2% (1)

   Determine sample

2% (1)

0% (0)

   Generate content of instrument

30% (13)

10% (5)

   Cognitively test instrument

9% (4)

6% (3)

   Aid scale construction

0% (0)

2% (1)

   Test validity of questionnaire

0% (0)

2% (1)

   Develop intervention

16% (7)

13% (6)

   Pilot intervention

2% (1)

2% (1)

   Describe intervention

12% (5)

4% (2)

   Study how intervention works

19% (8)

8% (4)

   Study how the service works

5% (2)

13% (6)

   Study intervention in practice

12% (5)

6% (3)

   Process evaluation

14% (6)

4% (2)

   Views of intervention

2% (1)

8% (4)

   Determine outcomes and measures

0% (0)

0% (0)

   Improve trial methodology

5% (2)

2% (1)

   Explore RCT as social construct

2% (1)

0% (0)

   Facilitate user involvement

0% (0)

2% (1)

   Explore an issue

33% (14)

38% (18)

   Uncover issues inaccessible to quant

7% (3)

0% (0)

   Explore acceptability of care

7% (3)

6% (3)

   Assess effectiveness

0% (0)

2% (1)

   Explain relationships

12% (5)

10% (5)

   Explore unusual findings

0% (0)

0% (0)

   Explore issues from quantitative

7% (3)

4% (2)

   Explore identified unusual groups

2% (1)

0% (0)

   Offer case illustrations

5% (2)

6% (3)

   Offer depth information on new cases

12% (5)

6% (3)

   Confirm a quantitative finding

2% (1)

4% (2)

   Understand results in real world

7% (3)

2% (1)