| |
Proposal (N = 43)
|
Report (N = 48)
|
|
Test effectiveness
|
47% (20)
|
46% (22)
|
|
Describe
|
40% (17)
|
54% (26)
|
|
Explain variability
|
26% (11)
|
21% (10)
|
|
Determine sample for qualitative
|
35% (15)
|
40% (19)
|
|
Generalise the qualitative findings
|
5% (2)
|
4% (2)
|
|
Generate consensus
|
5% (2)
|
2% (1)
|
|
Psychometrically test
|
2% (1)
|
4% (2)
|
|
Provide topic guide for qualitative
|
2% (1)
|
4% (2)
|
|
Role of qualitative
| | |
|
Develop the research question
|
0% (0)
|
0% (0)
|
|
Generate hypothesis
|
0% (0)
|
0% (0)
|
|
Establish theoretical framework
|
2% (1)
|
2% (1)
|
|
Determine sample
|
2% (1)
|
0% (0)
|
|
Generate content of instrument
|
30% (13)
|
10% (5)
|
|
Cognitively test instrument
|
9% (4)
|
6% (3)
|
|
Aid scale construction
|
0% (0)
|
2% (1)
|
|
Test validity of questionnaire
|
0% (0)
|
2% (1)
|
|
Develop intervention
|
16% (7)
|
13% (6)
|
|
Pilot intervention
|
2% (1)
|
2% (1)
|
|
Describe intervention
|
12% (5)
|
4% (2)
|
|
Study how intervention works
|
19% (8)
|
8% (4)
|
|
Study how the service works
|
5% (2)
|
13% (6)
|
|
Study intervention in practice
|
12% (5)
|
6% (3)
|
|
Process evaluation
|
14% (6)
|
4% (2)
|
|
Views of intervention
|
2% (1)
|
8% (4)
|
|
Determine outcomes and measures
|
0% (0)
|
0% (0)
|
|
Improve trial methodology
|
5% (2)
|
2% (1)
|
|
Explore RCT as social construct
|
2% (1)
|
0% (0)
|
|
Facilitate user involvement
|
0% (0)
|
2% (1)
|
|
Explore an issue
|
33% (14)
|
38% (18)
|
|
Uncover issues inaccessible to quant
|
7% (3)
|
0% (0)
|
|
Explore acceptability of care
|
7% (3)
|
6% (3)
|
|
Assess effectiveness
|
0% (0)
|
2% (1)
|
|
Explain relationships
|
12% (5)
|
10% (5)
|
|
Explore unusual findings
|
0% (0)
|
0% (0)
|
|
Explore issues from quantitative
|
7% (3)
|
4% (2)
|
|
Explore identified unusual groups
|
2% (1)
|
0% (0)
|
|
Offer case illustrations
|
5% (2)
|
6% (3)
|
|
Offer depth information on new cases
|
12% (5)
|
6% (3)
|
|
Confirm a quantitative finding
|
2% (1)
|
4% (2)
|
|
Understand results in real world
|
7% (3)
|
2% (1)
|
