Peer Review reports
From: A philosophical analysis of the evidence-based medicine debate
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Apr 2003 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Apr 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Scott Sehon |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Apr 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Apr 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Scott Sehon |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Apr 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 May 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Denise Dupras |
5 May 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ross Upshur |
4 Jun 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Scott Sehon |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Jun 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
26 Jun 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ross Upshur |
15 Jul 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Scott Sehon |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Jul 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
21 Jul 2003 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jul 2003 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-3-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.