Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Increased fairness in priority setting processes within the health sector: the case of Kapiri-Mposhi District, Zambia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francois Dionne
16 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Flora Fang-Hwa Teng
26 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Joseph Zulu
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francois Dionne
13 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Flora Fang-Hwa Teng
20 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Joseph Zulu
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francois Dionne
24 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ya-Seng (Arthur) Hsueh
12 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Joseph Zulu
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ya-Seng (Arthur) Hsueh
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
18 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-75

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement