Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Estimating recruitment rates for routine use of patient reported outcome measures and the impact on provider comparisons

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
1 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Himmel
21 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miranda Wolpert
30 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 8
30 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
17 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Himmel
19 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 10
19 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 10
15 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Himmel
5 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 11
5 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
5 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-66

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement