Skip to main content

Table 1 Typology of services assessed

From: Factors associated with quality of services for marginalized groups with mental health problems in 14 European countries

 

Target population

Primary focus of care

Generic

Group-specific

Mental health

Social care

General health

Austria

18 (5.1)

28 (10.5)

9 (3.3)

32 (11.8)

5 (6.8)

France

41 (11.7)

21 (7.9)

31 (11.4)

11 (4.1)

20 (27.0)

Hungary

4 (1.1)

1 (0.4)

1 (0.4)

1 (0.4)

3 (4.1)

Poland

26 (7.4)

16 (6.0)

17 (6.3)

19 (7.0)

6 (8.1)

Czech Republic

11 (3.1)

8 (3.0)

6 (2.2)

12 (4.4)

1 (1.4)

Germany

79 (22.6)

50 (18.7)

53 (19.5)

66 (24.4)

10 (13.5)

Italy

15 (4.3)

19 (7.1)

14 (5.1)

12 (4.4)

8 (10.8)

Netherlands

24 (6.9)

13 (4.9)

23 (8.5)

14 (5.2)

0

Sweden

0

5 (1.9)

2 (0.7)

0

3 (4.1)

Belgium

34 (9.7)

20 (7.5)

21 (7.7)

24 (8.9)

9 (12.2)

UK

38 (10.9)

28 (10.5)

40 (14.7)

21 (7.7)

5 (6.8)

Spain

6 (1.7)

11 (4.1)

6 (2.2)

11 (4.1)

0

Portugal

17 (4.9)

4 (1.5)

13 (4.8)

7 (2.6)

1 (1.4)

Ireland

37 (10.6)

43 (16.1)

36 (13.2)

41 (15.1)

3 (4.1)

Total

350

267

272

271

74

  1. Figures are n (%).
  2. Services were classified as either generic or group-specific, based on their target users: if more than 50% of the people using a service were from one of the marginalised group, the service was classified as specific for that group.
  3. Social care, mental health or general health service classification was based on service self-definition. In cases where it was not clear whether a service was mental health specific or generic, if 50% of clients were estimated to have a mental health problem the service was classified as a mental health service.