Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The development and evaluation of a five-language multi-perspective standardised measure: clinical decision-making involvement and satisfaction (CDIS)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Scholl
31 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Thomson
4 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Thomson
19 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Scholl
28 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
28 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-323

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement