The development and evaluation of a five-language multi-perspective standardised measure: clinical decision-making involvement and satisfaction (CDIS)
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Slade|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isabelle Scholl|
|31 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Thomson|
|4 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Slade|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Thomson|
|19 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isabelle Scholl|
|28 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Slade|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jul 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-323|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.